Learning Objectives
By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
- Explain how phonons contribute to the heat capacity of solids
- Understand the classical Dulong-Petit law and its limitations
- Derive and apply the Einstein and Debye models of heat capacity
- Explain the T³ law for heat capacity at low temperatures
- Connect the Grüneisen parameter to thermal expansion
- Understand the role of anharmonicity in thermal properties
- Calculate heat capacity using Python for different models
1. Introduction: Phonons and Thermal Properties
In previous chapters, we learned that phonons are quantized lattice vibrations. But why should we care about these quantum mechanical objects? The answer lies in their profound influence on the macroscopic thermal properties of materials. Every time you heat a metal, observe thermal expansion, or measure thermal conductivity, you're witnessing the collective behavior of trillions of phonons.
This chapter bridges the gap between microscopic phonon physics and macroscopic thermal phenomena. We'll see how the distribution of phonon modes—characterized by the density of states we studied in Chapter 3— directly determines properties like heat capacity and thermal expansion.
Key Insight
The fundamental connection is simple: thermal energy in solids is stored primarily in phonons. When you add heat to a crystal, you're creating phonons. When the crystal expands with temperature, it's because anharmonic phonon interactions change the equilibrium lattice spacing.
2. Classical Theory: The Dulong-Petit Law
2.1 Historical Context
In 1819, French scientists Pierre Louis Dulong and Alexis Thérèse Petit made an empirical observation: at high temperatures, the molar heat capacity of many solid elements is approximately constant, around 25 J/(mol·K) or 3R, where R is the gas constant (8.314 J/(mol·K)).
2.2 Classical Derivation
From classical statistical mechanics, we can derive this result. Consider N atoms in a solid, each able to vibrate in three dimensions. Each degree of freedom has average energy kBT/2 (kinetic) + kBT/2 (potential) = kBT by the equipartition theorem.
Total energy for N atoms with 3N degrees of freedom:
$$U = 3Nk_BT$$The heat capacity at constant volume is:
$$C_V = \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_V = 3Nk_B = 3R \approx 25 \text{ J/(mol·K)}$$where we used N = NA (Avogadro's number) for one mole.
Dulong-Petit Law
For a solid at high temperature: CV = 3R ≈ 25 J/(mol·K)
This is remarkably accurate for many elements at room temperature and above.
2.3 Limitations of the Classical Theory
However, the Dulong-Petit law fails dramatically in several important cases:
- Low Temperatures: Heat capacity drops to zero as T → 0, not remaining at 3R
- Light Elements: Diamond, beryllium, and silicon have CV ≪ 3R even at room temperature
- Temperature Dependence: The classical theory predicts no temperature dependence, but experiments show CV(T) varies strongly
These failures pointed to a fundamental problem: classical physics cannot explain the thermal properties of solids. A quantum theory was needed.
3. Einstein Model of Heat Capacity
3.1 Einstein's Quantum Hypothesis (1907)
Albert Einstein made a revolutionary proposal: treat each atom as an independent quantum harmonic oscillator with a single characteristic frequency ωE. Unlike classical oscillators that can have any energy, quantum oscillators have discrete energy levels:
$$E_n = \hbar\omega_E\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right), \quad n = 0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots$$The key quantum feature: oscillators at low temperature tend to stay in low energy states.
3.2 Derivation of Einstein Heat Capacity
Using Bose-Einstein statistics, the average number of phonons at temperature T is:
$$\langle n \rangle = \frac{1}{e^{\hbar\omega_E/k_BT} - 1}$$The average energy per oscillator (excluding zero-point energy):
$$\langle E \rangle = \hbar\omega_E \langle n \rangle = \frac{\hbar\omega_E}{e^{\hbar\omega_E/k_BT} - 1}$$For N atoms (3N oscillators), total energy:
$$U = 3N\frac{\hbar\omega_E}{e^{\hbar\omega_E/k_BT} - 1}$$Heat capacity:
$$C_V^{\text{Einstein}} = \frac{\partial U}{\partial T} = 3Nk_B\left(\frac{\hbar\omega_E}{k_BT}\right)^2 \frac{e^{\hbar\omega_E/k_BT}}{\left(e^{\hbar\omega_E/k_BT} - 1\right)^2}$$Defining the Einstein temperature ΘE = ℏωE/kB:
$$C_V^{\text{Einstein}} = 3R\left(\frac{\Theta_E}{T}\right)^2 \frac{e^{\Theta_E/T}}{\left(e^{\Theta_E/T} - 1\right)^2}$$3.3 Behavior of Einstein Model
High Temperature Limit (T ≫ ΘE):
When T ≫ ΘE, eΘE/T ≈ 1 + ΘE/T, giving:
$$C_V^{\text{Einstein}} \approx 3R$$✓ Recovers the classical Dulong-Petit law!
Low Temperature Limit (T ≪ ΘE):
$$C_V^{\text{Einstein}} \approx 3R\left(\frac{\Theta_E}{T}\right)^2 e^{-\Theta_E/T}$$✓ Goes to zero as T → 0 (satisfies third law of thermodynamics)
✗ But decreases exponentially, not as T³ as observed experimentally
Einstein Temperature Values
| Material | ΘE (K) | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Lead (Pb) | 88 | Soft, heavy metal |
| Aluminum (Al) | 240 | Light metal |
| Copper (Cu) | 240 | Common metal |
| Diamond (C) | 1860 | Strong covalent bonds |
4. Debye Model of Heat Capacity
4.1 Debye's Improvement (1912)
Peter Debye realized that Einstein's assumption of a single frequency was too simplistic. Real solids have a continuous spectrum of phonon frequencies, as we learned in Chapter 3. Debye proposed using the phonon density of states g(ω) in a more realistic model.
4.2 Debye Approximation
Debye made a crucial simplification: approximate the phonon DOS with:
$$g(\omega) = \begin{cases} \frac{9N}{\omega_D^3}\omega^2 & 0 \leq \omega \leq \omega_D \\ 0 & \omega > \omega_D \end{cases}$$where ωD is the Debye cutoff frequency, chosen so that:
$$\int_0^{\omega_D} g(\omega) d\omega = 3N$$(total of 3N modes for N atoms)
Physical Meaning
This approximation assumes all modes are acoustic-like with ω ∝ k up to a cutoff. It's exactly correct for the Debye model from Chapter 3, and a reasonable approximation for many real materials.
4.3 Debye Heat Capacity Formula
Total internal energy:
$$U = \int_0^{\omega_D} g(\omega) \hbar\omega \langle n(\omega) \rangle d\omega = \int_0^{\omega_D} \frac{9N\omega^2}{\omega_D^3} \frac{\hbar\omega}{e^{\hbar\omega/k_BT} - 1} d\omega$$Defining the Debye temperature ΘD = ℏωD/kB and x = ℏω/(kBT):
$$U = 9Nk_BT\left(\frac{T}{\Theta_D}\right)^3 \int_0^{\Theta_D/T} \frac{x^3}{e^x - 1} dx$$The heat capacity is:
$$C_V^{\text{Debye}} = 9R\left(\frac{T}{\Theta_D}\right)^3 \int_0^{\Theta_D/T} \frac{x^4 e^x}{(e^x - 1)^2} dx$$This integral defines the Debye function D(ΘD/T).
4.4 Low and High Temperature Limits
High Temperature (T ≫ ΘD):
$$C_V^{\text{Debye}} \to 3R$$✓ Recovers Dulong-Petit law
Low Temperature (T ≪ ΘD):
When T ≪ ΘD, the upper limit of integration becomes ∞, and the integral equals 4π⁴/15:
$$C_V^{\text{Debye}} = \frac{12\pi^4}{5}R\left(\frac{T}{\Theta_D}\right)^3 = \frac{234R}{\Theta_D^3}T^3$$Debye T³ Law
At low temperatures: CV ∝ T³
This matches experimental observations beautifully and is one of the great triumphs of quantum theory in solid-state physics!
4.5 Physical Origin of T³ Law
Why does heat capacity scale as T³ at low temperature? Two factors:
- Density of states: g(ω) ∝ ω² for acoustic phonons (3D Debye model)
- Thermal occupation: Only phonons with ℏω ≲ kBT are thermally excited. The number of such modes scales as (kBT)³
Result: CV ∝ (fraction of excited modes) × (energy per mode) ∝ T³ × T = T³
4.6 Debye Temperature Values
Debye Temperatures for Common Materials
| Material | ΘD (K) | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Lead (Pb) | 105 | Soft metal |
| Gold (Au) | 165 | Noble metal |
| Silver (Ag) | 225 | Noble metal |
| Copper (Cu) | 343 | Transition metal |
| Aluminum (Al) | 428 | Light metal |
| Silicon (Si) | 645 | Semiconductor |
| Diamond (C) | 2230 | Covalent crystal |
Trend: ΘD increases with bond strength and decreases with atomic mass
5. Comparison with Experimental Data
5.1 Heat Capacity Measurements
Experimental heat capacity measurements can be performed using calorimetry. The Debye model provides excellent agreement with experiment for most elemental solids, especially at low temperatures.
Key experimental observations:
- At T < ΘD/10: CV ∝ T³ holds very accurately
- At T ≈ ΘD: Transition region between quantum and classical behavior
- At T > ΘD: CV → 3R (Dulong-Petit limit)
5.2 Deviations from Debye Model
The Debye model is not perfect. Deviations occur due to:
- Electronic contribution: In metals, conduction electrons contribute Cel ∝ T at low temperature
- Optical phonons: Materials with multiple atoms per unit cell have optical modes not captured by simple Debye model
- Anharmonicity: At high T, anharmonic effects cause CV to exceed 3R slightly
Total Heat Capacity in Metals
For metals at low temperature:
$$C_V = \gamma T + \beta T^3$$where γT is the electronic contribution and βT³ is the phonon (Debye) contribution.
6. Python Implementation: Heat Capacity Calculations
6.1 Einstein Model Code
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy import integrate
def einstein_heat_capacity(T, theta_E, R=8.314):
"""
Calculate heat capacity using Einstein model.
Parameters:
-----------
T : float or array
Temperature in Kelvin
theta_E : float
Einstein temperature in Kelvin
R : float
Gas constant (default: 8.314 J/(mol·K))
Returns:
--------
C_V : float or array
Molar heat capacity in J/(mol·K)
"""
x = theta_E / T
# Avoid division by zero or overflow
x = np.clip(x, 1e-10, 100)
exp_x = np.exp(x)
C_V = 3 * R * (x**2) * exp_x / (exp_x - 1)**2
return C_V
# Example: Calculate for Copper (theta_E ≈ 240 K)
T_range = np.linspace(10, 500, 200)
C_einstein = einstein_heat_capacity(T_range, theta_E=240)
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
plt.plot(T_range, C_einstein, label='Einstein Model (Θ_E=240 K)', linewidth=2)
plt.axhline(y=3*8.314, color='r', linestyle='--', label='Dulong-Petit (3R)')
plt.xlabel('Temperature (K)', fontsize=12)
plt.ylabel('C_V (J/(mol·K))', fontsize=12)
plt.title('Einstein Model Heat Capacity', fontsize=14)
plt.legend(fontsize=11)
plt.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
6.2 Debye Model Code
def debye_integrand(x):
"""Integrand for Debye heat capacity integral."""
if x < 1e-10:
return 0
exp_x = np.exp(x)
return (x**4 * exp_x) / (exp_x - 1)**2
def debye_heat_capacity(T, theta_D, R=8.314):
"""
Calculate heat capacity using Debye model.
Parameters:
-----------
T : float or array
Temperature in Kelvin
theta_D : float
Debye temperature in Kelvin
R : float
Gas constant (default: 8.314 J/(mol·K))
Returns:
--------
C_V : float or array
Molar heat capacity in J/(mol·K)
"""
# Handle array input
T = np.atleast_1d(T)
C_V = np.zeros_like(T, dtype=float)
for i, temp in enumerate(T):
if temp < 0.01:
C_V[i] = 0
elif temp > 10 * theta_D:
# High temperature limit
C_V[i] = 3 * R
else:
# Numerical integration
x_max = theta_D / temp
integral, _ = integrate.quad(debye_integrand, 0, x_max)
C_V[i] = 9 * R * (temp / theta_D)**3 * integral
return C_V if len(C_V) > 1 else C_V[0]
# Low-temperature T³ approximation
def debye_low_T_approx(T, theta_D, R=8.314):
"""
Debye T³ law approximation for low temperatures.
"""
return (12 * np.pi**4 / 5) * R * (T / theta_D)**3
# Example: Compare Debye model with T³ approximation
T_low = np.linspace(1, 100, 100)
theta_D_Cu = 343 # Copper
C_debye_full = debye_heat_capacity(T_low, theta_D_Cu)
C_debye_T3 = debye_low_T_approx(T_low, theta_D_Cu)
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
plt.plot(T_low, C_debye_full, label='Full Debye Model', linewidth=2)
plt.plot(T_low, C_debye_T3, '--', label='T³ Approximation', linewidth=2)
plt.xlabel('Temperature (K)', fontsize=12)
plt.ylabel('C_V (J/(mol·K))', fontsize=12)
plt.title('Debye Model: Full vs T³ Approximation (Cu, Θ_D=343 K)', fontsize=14)
plt.legend(fontsize=11)
plt.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
6.3 Comparing All Three Models
def compare_heat_capacity_models(theta_E=240, theta_D=343, material='Copper'):
"""
Compare Dulong-Petit, Einstein, and Debye models.
"""
T_range = np.logspace(0, 2.7, 200) # 1 to ~500 K, log scale
# Calculate heat capacities
C_dulong_petit = 3 * 8.314 * np.ones_like(T_range)
C_einstein = einstein_heat_capacity(T_range, theta_E)
C_debye = debye_heat_capacity(T_range, theta_D)
# Plotting
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(15, 6))
# Linear scale plot
ax1.plot(T_range, C_dulong_petit, 'k--', label='Dulong-Petit', linewidth=2)
ax1.plot(T_range, C_einstein, label=f'Einstein (Θ_E={theta_E} K)', linewidth=2)
ax1.plot(T_range, C_debye, label=f'Debye (Θ_D={theta_D} K)', linewidth=2)
ax1.set_xlabel('Temperature (K)', fontsize=12)
ax1.set_ylabel('C_V (J/(mol·K))', fontsize=12)
ax1.set_title(f'Heat Capacity Models - {material}', fontsize=14)
ax1.legend(fontsize=11)
ax1.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
ax1.set_ylim(0, 30)
# Log-log plot (better for low T)
ax2.loglog(T_range, C_einstein, label=f'Einstein (Θ_E={theta_E} K)', linewidth=2)
ax2.loglog(T_range, C_debye, label=f'Debye (Θ_D={theta_D} K)', linewidth=2)
# Add T³ reference line
T_ref = np.logspace(0, 1.5, 50)
C_ref = 0.1 * (T_ref)**3
ax2.loglog(T_ref, C_ref, 'k:', label='T³ reference', linewidth=1.5)
ax2.set_xlabel('Temperature (K)', fontsize=12)
ax2.set_ylabel('C_V (J/(mol·K))', fontsize=12)
ax2.set_title(f'Log-Log Plot - {material}', fontsize=14)
ax2.legend(fontsize=11)
ax2.grid(True, alpha=0.3, which='both')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
# Print comparison at specific temperatures
print(f"\n{material} Heat Capacity Comparison:")
print(f"{'T (K)':<10} {'Dulong-Petit':<15} {'Einstein':<15} {'Debye':<15}")
print("-" * 55)
for T in [10, 50, 100, 200, 300, 500]:
C_dp = 3 * 8.314
C_e = einstein_heat_capacity(T, theta_E)
C_d = debye_heat_capacity(T, theta_D)
print(f"{T:<10} {C_dp:<15.2f} {C_e:<15.2f} {C_d:<15.2f}")
# Run comparison
compare_heat_capacity_models(theta_E=240, theta_D=343, material='Copper')
Expected Output
Running this code will show:
- Einstein model drops too quickly at low T (exponential decay)
- Debye model follows T³ law perfectly at low T
- Both converge to Dulong-Petit limit (3R) at high T
- Debye model generally agrees better with experimental data
7. Thermal Expansion
7.1 The Origin of Thermal Expansion
Why do materials expand when heated? Surprisingly, the harmonic approximation predicts zero thermal expansion! In a purely harmonic potential, the average atomic position doesn't change with temperature—atoms just vibrate more vigorously about the same equilibrium point.
Thermal expansion arises from anharmonicity in the interatomic potential. Real potentials are asymmetric: it's easier to pull atoms apart than to push them together.
7.2 Anharmonic Potential
A realistic interatomic potential can be expanded as:
$$U(r) = U_0 + \frac{1}{2}k(r - r_0)^2 + g(r - r_0)^3 + \ldots$$where:
- k is the harmonic force constant (k > 0)
- g is the cubic anharmonic term (typically g < 0)
- r₀ is the equilibrium separation at T = 0
The negative cubic term (g < 0) means the potential is softer (easier to stretch) at larger separations. As atoms vibrate with larger amplitude at higher T, they sample this asymmetric potential, leading to an increase in the average bond length.
7.3 Linear Thermal Expansion Coefficient
The linear thermal expansion coefficient is defined as:
$$\alpha_L = \frac{1}{L}\frac{dL}{dT}$$where L is a linear dimension of the crystal.
For a 3D crystal, the volumetric thermal expansion coefficient is:
$$\alpha_V = \frac{1}{V}\frac{dV}{dT} \approx 3\alpha_L$$Thermal expansion is directly related to phonon anharmonicity and can be quantified using the Grüneisen parameter.
8. The Grüneisen Parameter
8.1 Definition
The Grüneisen parameter γ quantifies how phonon frequencies change when the crystal volume changes. For a phonon mode with frequency ω:
$$\gamma_i = -\frac{d\ln\omega_i}{d\ln V} = -\frac{V}{\omega_i}\frac{\partial\omega_i}{\partial V}$$The mode Grüneisen parameter tells us: if we compress the crystal (reduce V), how much does the phonon frequency increase?
8.2 Physical Interpretation
Positive γ (typical): Compression increases phonon frequencies (atoms vibrate faster when pushed closer together). Most materials have γ ≈ 1–3.
Negative γ (rare): Some modes in certain materials have frequencies that decrease upon compression. This can lead to negative thermal expansion!
8.3 Average Grüneisen Parameter
For thermodynamic applications, we use an average Grüneisen parameter:
$$\gamma = \frac{\sum_i \gamma_i C_{V,i}}{\sum_i C_{V,i}} = \frac{\sum_i \gamma_i C_{V,i}}{C_V}$$where CV,i is the heat capacity contribution from mode i.
In the Debye approximation, assuming γ is constant for all modes:
$$\gamma_{\text{Debye}} \approx \frac{d\ln\omega_D}{d\ln V}$$8.4 Grüneisen Relation
The Grüneisen parameter connects thermal expansion to heat capacity through the fundamental relation:
$$\alpha_V = \frac{\gamma C_V}{B_T V}$$where:
- αV is the volumetric thermal expansion coefficient
- CV is the heat capacity at constant volume
- BT is the isothermal bulk modulus
- V is the volume
Key Insight
The Grüneisen relation shows that thermal expansion is proportional to heat capacity. Both are determined by phonons, but thermal expansion requires anharmonicity while heat capacity does not.
8.5 Typical Values
Grüneisen Parameters for Common Materials
| Material | γ | αL (10⁻⁶ K⁻¹) | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diamond | 0.8 | 1.1 | Very low expansion |
| Silicon | 0.5 | 2.6 | Low expansion |
| Aluminum | 2.2 | 23.1 | Typical metal |
| Copper | 2.0 | 16.5 | Typical metal |
| Lead | 2.7 | 28.9 | Soft metal, high expansion |
| ZrW₂O₈ | Negative | -9.1 | Negative thermal expansion! |
8.6 Temperature Dependence of Thermal Expansion
Since αV ∝ CV, thermal expansion follows the same temperature dependence as heat capacity:
- Low T: αV ∝ T³ (follows Debye T³ law)
- High T: αV ≈ constant (CV → 3R)
This is observed experimentally: thermal expansion coefficients decrease dramatically as T → 0.
9. Anharmonicity and Its Role
9.1 Beyond the Harmonic Approximation
The harmonic approximation, while incredibly useful, fails to explain several important phenomena:
- Thermal expansion (requires anharmonicity)
- Thermal conductivity (phonon-phonon scattering needs anharmonicity)
- Temperature-dependent phonon frequencies
- Phonon lifetimes (infinite in harmonic approximation)
9.2 Anharmonic Phonon Interactions
In anharmonic theory, phonons can interact with each other. The cubic anharmonic term allows processes like:
- 3-phonon processes: One phonon splits into two, or two combine into one
- 4-phonon processes: Higher-order interactions (weaker)
Conservation laws apply:
$$\mathbf{k}_1 + \mathbf{k}_2 = \mathbf{k}_3 + \mathbf{G}$$ $$\omega_1 + \omega_2 = \omega_3$$where G is a reciprocal lattice vector (for Umklapp processes).
9.3 Impact on Thermal Properties
Thermal Conductivity:
Phonon-phonon scattering from anharmonicity limits thermal conductivity. At high T:
$$\kappa \propto \frac{1}{T}$$This is why diamond (very harmonic, weak anharmonicity) has extremely high thermal conductivity.
Thermal Expansion:
As discussed, anharmonicity is essential for thermal expansion through the Grüneisen mechanism.
Temperature-Dependent Phonon Frequencies:
Phonon frequencies shift with temperature due to anharmonic interactions:
$$\omega(T) = \omega_0 + \Delta\omega_{\text{anh}}(T)$$This can be measured by temperature-dependent Raman spectroscopy or inelastic neutron scattering.
10. Summary
Key Takeaways
- Classical Dulong-Petit law (CV = 3R) works at high T but fails at low T and for light elements
- Einstein model introduces quantum mechanics with a single frequency, captures T → 0 behavior but with exponential decay
- Debye model uses realistic phonon DOS, predicts correct T³ law at low temperatures
- Debye T³ law: CV ∝ T³ at T ≪ ΘD is a signature of acoustic phonons in 3D
- Thermal expansion requires anharmonicity—harmonic crystals don't expand
- Grüneisen parameter γ connects phonon frequencies to volume changes and relates thermal expansion to heat capacity
- Anharmonicity is essential for thermal expansion, thermal conductivity, and phonon lifetimes
Connections to Other Chapters
This chapter completes the bridge from microscopic phonon theory (Chapters 1-3) to macroscopic thermal properties. In Chapter 5, we'll explore how these concepts apply to real materials and how experimental techniques measure phonon properties.
Exercises
Exercise 1: Dulong-Petit Law
Problem: Calculate the molar heat capacity predicted by the Dulong-Petit law in units of J/(mol·K) and cal/(mol·K). Compare with experimental values for copper at 300 K (CV ≈ 24.5 J/(mol·K)).
Hint: Use R = 8.314 J/(mol·K) and 1 cal = 4.184 J.
Exercise 2: Einstein Temperature
Problem: For aluminum with Einstein temperature ΘE = 240 K, calculate the molar heat capacity at:
- (a) T = 10 K
- (b) T = 100 K
- (c) T = 300 K
Hint: Use the Einstein formula or the Python code provided.
Exercise 3: Debye T³ Law
Problem: Show that at very low temperatures (T ≪ ΘD), the Debye heat capacity reduces to:
$$C_V = \frac{12\pi^4}{5}R\left(\frac{T}{\Theta_D}\right)^3$$Hint: Take the limit ΘD/T → ∞ in the Debye integral.
Exercise 4: Comparing Models
Problem: Use the Python code to plot Einstein and Debye heat capacities for diamond (ΘE ≈ 1860 K, ΘD ≈ 2230 K) from T = 10 K to T = 3000 K. Explain why both models give CV ≪ 3R at room temperature (300 K).
Exercise 5: Grüneisen Parameter
Problem: Copper has γ ≈ 2.0, bulk modulus BT ≈ 140 GPa, and molar volume Vm ≈ 7.1 × 10⁻⁶ m³/mol. Calculate the linear thermal expansion coefficient αL at room temperature (assume CV ≈ 3R).
Hint: Use the Grüneisen relation and αL ≈ αV/3.
Exercise 6: Programming Challenge
Problem: Modify the Python code to fit experimental heat capacity data. Given data points for a material, use curve fitting to determine the Debye temperature ΘD.
Extension: Try fitting with both Einstein and Debye models and compare which gives better agreement.
Exercise 7: Negative Thermal Expansion
Problem: Research the material ZrW₂O₈, which exhibits negative thermal expansion. Explain in terms of phonon modes and Grüneisen parameters how a material can contract when heated.
Hint: Consider transverse acoustic modes with negative Grüneisen parameters.