Learning Objectives
By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
- Explain why anharmonic terms are necessary for realistic crystal physics
- Derive the phonon-phonon scattering rate using Fermi's golden rule
- Distinguish between three-phonon decay and coalescence processes
- Understand the difference between normal (N) and umklapp (U) processes
- Apply conservation laws for energy and crystal momentum in phonon scattering
- Calculate phonon lifetimes and relate them to experimental linewidths
- Explain the temperature dependence of phonon scattering rates
- Connect phonon interactions to thermal resistance mechanisms
- Implement Python code for phonon scattering rate calculations
- Identify experimental signatures of anharmonicity in spectroscopic data
1. Introduction: The Necessity of Anharmonicity
In Chapter 1, we developed the harmonic approximation where the lattice potential was expanded to second order in atomic displacements. While this approximation successfully explains many phonon properties (dispersion relations, density of states), it has fundamental limitations:
Limitations of the Harmonic Approximation
- Infinite phonon lifetimes: Harmonic phonons are exact eigenstates that never decay
- No thermal expansion: The crystal lattice constant would be temperature-independent
- Infinite thermal conductivity: No mechanism exists for phonon scattering and thermal resistance
- No phonon-phonon interactions: Phonons would propagate independently forever
Real materials exhibit all of these phenomena, demonstrating that the harmonic approximation, while useful, is incomplete. The solution lies in including anharmonic terms in the lattice potential expansion.
1.1 Anharmonic Potential Energy
The total potential energy of a crystal can be expanded in powers of atomic displacements \(\mathbf{u}\) from equilibrium positions:
Where:
- \(V_0\) is the potential energy at equilibrium
- The linear term vanishes because we expand around the equilibrium (minimum energy) position
- The second-order term defines the harmonic approximation
- Higher-order terms introduce anharmonic effects
Notation for Force Constants
We define force constants of different orders:
- Second-order (harmonic): \(\Phi_{i\alpha, j\beta} = \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial u_{i\alpha} \partial u_{j\beta}}\)
- Third-order: \(\Phi_{i\alpha, j\beta, k\gamma} = \frac{\partial^3 V}{\partial u_{i\alpha} \partial u_{j\beta} \partial u_{k\gamma}}\)
- Fourth-order: \(\Phi_{i\alpha, j\beta, k\gamma, l\delta} = \frac{\partial^4 V}{\partial u_{i\alpha} \partial u_{j\beta} \partial u_{k\gamma} \partial u_{l\delta}}\)
These are tensors that describe the stiffness of the lattice with respect to multi-atom displacements. Symmetry considerations greatly reduce the number of independent components.
1.2 Physical Interpretation of Anharmonic Terms
Each order of anharmonicity has a distinct physical meaning:
| Order | Mathematical Form | Physical Process | Example Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3rd order | \(\Phi^{(3)} u_1 u_2 u_3\) | Three-phonon interactions | One phonon splits into two, or two merge into one |
| 4th order | \(\Phi^{(4)} u_1 u_2 u_3 u_4\) | Four-phonon interactions | Two phonons scatter into two different phonons |
| Higher | \(\Phi^{(n)} \prod_{i=1}^n u_i\) | Multi-phonon processes | Typically weak, ignored in most analyses |
Perturbative Treatment
Anharmonic terms are typically much smaller than the harmonic term (by a factor of \(\sim u/a\) where \(u\) is the displacement amplitude and \(a\) is the lattice constant). Therefore, we can treat anharmonicity as a perturbation to the harmonic phonon states.
2. Fermi's Golden Rule for Phonon Scattering
To calculate phonon scattering rates due to anharmonicity, we use time-dependent perturbation theory. The key tool is Fermi's golden rule, which gives the transition rate between quantum states.
2.1 Statement of Fermi's Golden Rule
For a system initially in state \(|i\rangle\) transitioning to final state \(|f\rangle\) due to a perturbation \(\hat{H}'\), the transition rate is:
Where:
- \(W_{i \to f}\) is the transition rate (probability per unit time)
- \(\langle f | \hat{H}' | i \rangle\) is the matrix element of the perturbation
- \(\delta(E_f - E_i)\) is the Dirac delta function enforcing energy conservation
Derivation Outline (Optional)
Fermi's golden rule follows from time-dependent perturbation theory. Starting with the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and expanding the wavefunction in eigenstates of the unperturbed Hamiltonian, one obtains:
- First-order time-dependent coefficients: \(c_f^{(1)}(t) = -\frac{i}{\hbar} \int_0^t \langle f | \hat{H}'(t') | i \rangle e^{i\omega_{fi} t'} dt'\)
- For constant perturbation and long times: \(|c_f|^2 \propto t\)
- Transition rate = \(d|c_f|^2/dt\) yields Fermi's golden rule
- The delta function emerges from \(\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{\sin^2(\omega t/2)}{(\omega/2)^2} = 2\pi t \delta(\omega)\)
2.2 Application to Phonon-Phonon Scattering
For phonons, we need to express the anharmonic potential in terms of phonon creation and annihilation operators. Recall from quantum mechanics that atomic displacements can be written as:
Where \(a_{\mathbf{q}s}\) and \(a_{\mathbf{q}s}^\dagger\) are phonon annihilation and creation operators. Substituting this into the third-order anharmonic term yields:
Where \(V_3\) is the Fourier-transformed third-order force constant. Expanding this product gives eight terms corresponding to different phonon processes (creation/annihilation combinations).
3. Three-Phonon Processes
The third-order anharmonic Hamiltonian allows for two fundamental types of three-phonon processes:
ω₁ = ω₂ + ω₃"] C --> E["2 phonons → 1 phonon
ω₁ + ω₂ = ω₃"]
3.1 Decay Processes
In a decay process, one phonon spontaneously splits into two phonons:
This process corresponds to the term \(a_{\mathbf{q}_1}^\dagger a_{\mathbf{q}_2} a_{\mathbf{q}_3}\) in the Hamiltonian, which annihilates two phonons and creates one.
Conservation Laws:
- Energy conservation: \(\hbar\omega_{\mathbf{q}_1 s_1} = \hbar\omega_{\mathbf{q}_2 s_2} + \hbar\omega_{\mathbf{q}_3 s_3}\)
- Crystal momentum conservation: \(\mathbf{q}_1 = \mathbf{q}_2 + \mathbf{q}_3 + \mathbf{G}\)
The reciprocal lattice vector \(\mathbf{G}\) appears because crystal momentum is only defined modulo a reciprocal lattice vector. If \(\mathbf{G} = 0\), the process is called a normal process (N-process). If \(\mathbf{G} \neq 0\), it is an umklapp process (U-process).
3.2 Coalescence Processes
In a coalescence process, two phonons merge to form a single phonon:
This corresponds to the term \(a_{\mathbf{q}_1} a_{\mathbf{q}_2} a_{\mathbf{q}_3}^\dagger\) in the Hamiltonian.
Conservation Laws:
- Energy conservation: \(\hbar\omega_{\mathbf{q}_1 s_1} + \hbar\omega_{\mathbf{q}_2 s_2} = \hbar\omega_{\mathbf{q}_3 s_3}\)
- Crystal momentum conservation: \(\mathbf{q}_1 + \mathbf{q}_2 = \mathbf{q}_3 + \mathbf{G}\)
3.3 Scattering Rate Calculation
Using Fermi's golden rule, the scattering rate for a decay process is:
Where \(n_{\mathbf{q}s}\) is the Bose-Einstein occupation number:
The factors \((n + 1)\) come from the quantum mechanical matrix elements for phonon creation (stimulated emission plus spontaneous emission).
Similarly, for coalescence:
The total scattering rate is:
Phonon Lifetime
The phonon lifetime is the inverse of the scattering rate:
This lifetime appears in experimental measurements as the linewidth (full width at half maximum, FWHM) in spectroscopy:
4. Normal vs Umklapp Processes
The distinction between normal (N) and umklapp (U) processes is crucial for understanding thermal conductivity.
4.1 Normal Processes (N-processes)
Normal processes conserve crystal momentum exactly (\(\mathbf{G} = 0\)):
Characteristics of N-processes
- Conserve total phonon momentum (no momentum transfer to the crystal)
- Redistribute energy among phonon modes without changing the total momentum
- Do NOT contribute to thermal resistance (in the relaxation time approximation)
- Important for establishing local thermal equilibrium among phonons
- More probable at low temperatures (when phonon wavevectors are small)
4.2 Umklapp Processes (U-processes)
Umklapp processes (from German "umklappen" = to flip over) involve a reciprocal lattice vector \(\mathbf{G} \neq 0\):
Characteristics of U-processes
- Change the total phonon momentum by a reciprocal lattice vector
- Transfer momentum to the crystal lattice itself
- PRIMARY source of thermal resistance in pure crystals
- Require high-energy phonons (typically \(|\mathbf{q}| \sim \pi/2a\) or larger)
- Thermally activated: rate \(\propto e^{-\Theta_D/\beta T}\) at low \(T\)
4.3 Geometric Interpretation
The following diagram illustrates N and U processes in wavevector space:
first Brillouin zone"] end subgraph "Umklapp Process (U)" B1["q₁"] --> B2["q₂ + q₃ - G"] B3["Resultant wraps around
Brillouin zone boundary"] end
Consider a decay process where \(\mathbf{q}_1\) splits into \(\mathbf{q}_2\) and \(\mathbf{q}_3\):
- N-process: If \(\mathbf{q}_2 + \mathbf{q}_3\) falls within the first Brillouin zone, we simply have \(\mathbf{q}_1 = \mathbf{q}_2 + \mathbf{q}_3\).
- U-process: If \(\mathbf{q}_2 + \mathbf{q}_3\) falls outside the first Brillouin zone, we must subtract a reciprocal lattice vector \(\mathbf{G}\) to bring it back: \(\mathbf{q}_1 = \mathbf{q}_2 + \mathbf{q}_3 - \mathbf{G}\).
4.4 Temperature Dependence and Thermal Conductivity
The rate of U-processes has strong temperature dependence:
Where \(\Theta_D\) is the Debye temperature and \(\beta\) is a numerical factor (typically \(\beta \approx 2\) to 3).
This leads to the characteristic behavior of thermal conductivity \(\kappa(T)\) in pure crystals:
| Temperature Regime | Dominant Scattering | Thermal Conductivity |
|---|---|---|
| \(T \ll \Theta_D\) | Boundary scattering | \(\kappa \propto T^3\) (similar to \(C_V\)) |
| \(T \sim 0.1\Theta_D\) | U-processes become active | \(\kappa\) peaks and begins to decrease |
| \(T > \Theta_D\) | U-processes dominate | \(\kappa \propto 1/T\) |
Physical Insight: Why U-processes Cause Resistance
In a thermal gradient, phonons carry momentum preferentially in one direction (from hot to cold). N-processes redistribute this momentum among different phonon modes but preserve the total momentum flow. U-processes, however, can reverse the direction of momentum (by adding \(\mathbf{G}\)), effectively scattering phonons backward and creating resistance to heat flow.
5. Temperature Dependence of Phonon Scattering
The temperature dependence of phonon-phonon scattering arises from the Bose-Einstein occupation factors.
5.1 Occupation Number Temperature Dependence
The Bose-Einstein distribution is:
Limiting behaviors:
- Low temperature (\(k_B T \ll \hbar\omega\)): \(n \approx e^{-\hbar\omega/k_B T}\) (exponentially small)
- High temperature (\(k_B T \gg \hbar\omega\)): \(n \approx k_B T/\hbar\omega\) (classical limit)
5.2 Scattering Rate Temperature Scaling
The scattering rate for decay processes scales as:
At high temperatures where \(n \gg 1\):
For coalescence:
Therefore, in the high-temperature regime:
This leads to the classical thermal conductivity behavior \(\kappa \propto 1/T\) when U-processes dominate.
5.3 Low-Temperature Behavior
At low temperatures, only low-energy acoustic phonons are populated. The probability of U-processes is suppressed by:
This exponential suppression means that at very low \(T\), phonon-phonon scattering becomes negligible, and other mechanisms (boundary scattering, impurity scattering) dominate.
6. Fourth-Order Anharmonicity
While three-phonon processes dominate in most materials, fourth-order anharmonicity can be important in certain contexts.
6.1 Four-Phonon Scattering Processes
The fourth-order anharmonic Hamiltonian leads to processes like:
- \((\mathbf{q}_1, s_1) + (\mathbf{q}_2, s_2) \to (\mathbf{q}_3, s_3) + (\mathbf{q}_4, s_4)\) (two phonons scatter into two different phonons)
- \((\mathbf{q}_1, s_1) \to (\mathbf{q}_2, s_2) + (\mathbf{q}_3, s_3) + (\mathbf{q}_4, s_4)\) (one phonon decays into three)
These are typically weaker than three-phonon processes by a factor of \(\sim u/a\), but can become important:
- At very high temperatures
- When three-phonon processes are forbidden by selection rules
- In materials with high symmetry (where \(\Phi^{(3)}\) may vanish)
- For optical phonons in some materials
6.2 Recent Research: Four-Phonon Scattering in Thermal Conductivity
Four-Phonon Scattering in Modern Materials
Recent first-principles calculations have shown that four-phonon scattering can reduce thermal conductivity by 30-50% in materials like silicon and diamond at high temperatures. This was previously attributed solely to three-phonon processes.
Key findings:
- Four-phonon scattering is particularly important for high-frequency optical phonons
- Becomes comparable to three-phonon rates above \(T \sim \Theta_D/2\)
- Essential for accurate prediction of thermal conductivity at high \(T\)
Reference: Feng & Ruan, Phys. Rev. B 93, 045202 (2016)
7. Connection to Thermal Resistance
Understanding phonon scattering is essential for predicting and engineering thermal conductivity.
7.1 Thermal Conductivity Formula
From the Boltzmann transport equation (covered in detail in Chapter 3), the lattice thermal conductivity can be expressed as:
Where:
- \(C_{\mathbf{q}s} = \hbar\omega_{\mathbf{q}s} \frac{\partial n}{\partial T}\) is the mode-specific heat capacity
- \(v_{\mathbf{q}s} = |\nabla_{\mathbf{q}} \omega_{\mathbf{q}s}|\) is the phonon group velocity
- \(\tau_{\mathbf{q}s}\) is the phonon lifetime from all scattering mechanisms
7.2 Matthiessen's Rule for Combined Scattering
When multiple scattering mechanisms are present (phonon-phonon, phonon-impurity, phonon-boundary), the total scattering rate is the sum:
This is Matthiessen's rule, valid when scattering events are uncorrelated.
7.3 Thermal Resistance Mechanisms Summary
| Mechanism | Temperature Dependence | Dominant Regime |
|---|---|---|
| Umklapp scattering | \(\tau^{-1} \propto T^2 e^{-\Theta_D/\beta T}\) | \(T > \Theta_D/10\) |
| Normal processes | \(\tau^{-1} \propto T^2\) | Affect distribution, not \(\kappa\) |
| Boundary scattering | \(\tau^{-1} = v/L\) (independent of \(T\)) | Low \(T\), small samples |
| Impurity scattering | \(\tau^{-1} \propto \omega^4\) (Rayleigh) | Low \(T\), doped materials |
| Four-phonon | \(\tau^{-1} \propto T^3\) | High \(T\) (\(T > \Theta_D/2\)) |
Engineering Thermal Conductivity
Understanding phonon scattering mechanisms enables rational design:
- High \(\kappa\): Reduce anharmonicity, increase isotopic purity, minimize defects (e.g., diamond, isotopically pure silicon)
- Low \(\kappa\): Enhance anharmonicity, introduce mass disorder, nanostructuring (e.g., thermoelectric materials, thermal barriers)
8. Experimental Signatures of Anharmonicity
Anharmonic effects can be directly observed in various experimental techniques.
8.1 Spectroscopic Linewidths
In Raman, infrared, or neutron scattering spectroscopy, phonon peaks have finite width due to the finite lifetime:
This is a Lorentzian lineshape with FWHM = \(2\Gamma = 2\hbar/\tau\).
Temperature-Dependent Linewidth Measurements
Measuring the phonon linewidth as a function of temperature directly probes the anharmonic scattering rate:
- At low \(T\): Linewidth approaches instrument resolution (long lifetime)
- At high \(T\): Linewidth increases \(\propto T^2\) (three-phonon scattering)
- Slope gives information about anharmonic force constants
8.2 Phonon Frequency Shifts
Anharmonicity also causes phonon frequencies to shift with temperature:
The shift \(\Delta\omega(T)\) arises from:
- Volume expansion: Change in harmonic force constants due to lattice expansion
- Pure anharmonicity: Direct effect of anharmonic terms (phonon-phonon interactions)
Typically \(\Delta\omega < 0\) (phonons soften with increasing temperature).
8.3 Thermal Expansion
One of the most direct consequences of anharmonicity is thermal expansion. In the harmonic approximation, the lattice constant would be temperature-independent. The thermal expansion coefficient:
is directly proportional to the Grüneisen parameter \(\gamma\), which quantifies anharmonicity:
8.4 Inelastic Neutron Scattering
Neutron scattering can directly measure phonon dispersion curves. Anharmonic effects appear as:
- Asymmetric peak shapes (not perfect Lorentzians)
- Temperature-dependent peak positions
- Satellite peaks from higher-order processes
- Phonon decay pathways can sometimes be resolved
Example: Anharmonicity in Lead Telluride (PbTe)
PbTe, an important thermoelectric material, exhibits extremely strong anharmonicity. Neutron scattering studies reveal:
- Giant phonon linewidths at room temperature (20-30 cm⁻¹)
- Avoided crossings between acoustic and optical branches (resonant bonding)
- Strong temperature dependence of low-frequency transverse optical modes
This anharmonicity is crucial for PbTe's low thermal conductivity and good thermoelectric performance.
9. Computational Example: Phonon Scattering Rates
Let's implement a simplified calculation of three-phonon scattering rates using Python.
9.1 Simplified Model
We'll use a simplified isotropic model with Debye dispersion to demonstrate the concepts. For realistic calculations, one would use first-principles force constants.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.integrate import quad
from scipy.constants import hbar, k as kB
class SimplifiedPhononScattering:
"""
Simplified model for three-phonon scattering in an isotropic crystal.
Uses Debye approximation and simplified anharmonic coupling.
"""
def __init__(self, omega_D, v_sound, V0, gamma):
"""
Parameters:
-----------
omega_D : float
Debye frequency (rad/s)
v_sound : float
Sound velocity (m/s)
V0 : float
Cubic anharmonic coupling constant (J)
gamma : float
Grüneisen parameter (dimensionless)
"""
self.omega_D = omega_D
self.v_sound = v_sound
self.V0 = V0
self.gamma = gamma
self.q_D = omega_D / v_sound # Debye wavevector
def omega(self, q):
"""Debye dispersion relation"""
return self.v_sound * q
def bose_einstein(self, omega, T):
"""Bose-Einstein occupation number"""
x = hbar * omega / (kB * T)
if x > 100: # Avoid overflow
return 0.0
return 1.0 / (np.exp(x) - 1.0)
def check_energy_conservation(self, omega1, omega2, omega3, tolerance=1e-6):
"""Check if energy is conserved (for decay: omega1 = omega2 + omega3)"""
return np.abs(omega1 - omega2 - omega3) < tolerance
def check_momentum_conservation(self, q1, q2, q3):
"""
Check momentum conservation for decay: q1 = q2 + q3 (N-process)
or q1 = q2 + q3 - G (U-process)
Simplified 1D model: U-process if |q2 + q3| > q_D
"""
q_sum = q2 + q3
is_normal = np.abs(q1 - q_sum) < 1e-6
is_umklapp = np.abs(q1 - (q_sum - 2*self.q_D)) < 1e-6
return is_normal or is_umklapp, is_umklapp
def scattering_rate_decay(self, q1, T):
"""
Calculate decay scattering rate for phonon (q1) -> (q2) + (q3)
Simplified analytical estimate using Debye approximation.
"""
omega1 = self.omega(q1)
# In full calculation, would integrate over all allowed (q2, q3) pairs
# Here we use a simplified estimate proportional to phase space
n_avg = self.bose_einstein(omega1/2, T) # Average occupation
# Simplified rate: Gamma ~ V0^2 * (n+1)^2 * DOS
# With V0 ~ gamma * omega for cubic anharmonicity
rate = (self.gamma * omega1 / hbar)**2 * (n_avg + 1)**2 * omega1
# Add U-process suppression at low T
# U-processes require high-energy phonons
theta_D = hbar * self.omega_D / kB
if T < theta_D:
u_suppression = np.exp(-theta_D / (2 * T))
else:
u_suppression = 1.0
return rate * u_suppression
def scattering_rate_coalescence(self, q1, T):
"""
Calculate coalescence scattering rate for (q2) + (q3) -> (q1)
"""
omega1 = self.omega(q1)
n_avg = self.bose_einstein(omega1/2, T)
# Rate ~ V0^2 * n^2 * DOS
rate = (self.gamma * omega1 / hbar)**2 * n_avg**2 * omega1
return rate
def total_scattering_rate(self, q, T):
"""Total three-phonon scattering rate"""
return self.scattering_rate_decay(q, T) + self.scattering_rate_coalescence(q, T)
def phonon_lifetime(self, q, T):
"""Phonon lifetime tau = 1/Gamma"""
rate = self.total_scattering_rate(q, T)
return 1.0 / rate if rate > 0 else np.inf
def linewidth_fwhm(self, q, T):
"""Spectroscopic linewidth (FWHM) in energy units"""
return 2 * hbar * self.total_scattering_rate(q, T)
# Example: Silicon-like parameters
omega_D_Si = 2 * np.pi * 15e12 # 15 THz Debye frequency
v_sound_Si = 6400 # m/s average sound velocity
V0_Si = 1e-20 # J (typical order of magnitude)
gamma_Si = 0.5 # Grüneisen parameter for Si
model = SimplifiedPhononScattering(omega_D_Si, v_sound_Si, V0_Si, gamma_Si)
# Temperature array
temperatures = np.linspace(50, 600, 50)
# Choose a phonon wavevector (middle of Brillouin zone)
q_test = 0.5 * model.q_D
# Calculate lifetime vs temperature
lifetimes = [model.phonon_lifetime(q_test, T) for T in temperatures]
linewidths = [model.linewidth_fwhm(q_test, T) / (1.602e-19 * 1e3) for T in temperatures] # meV
# Plot results
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(12, 4))
ax1.plot(temperatures, np.array(lifetimes) * 1e12, 'b-', linewidth=2)
ax1.set_xlabel('Temperature (K)', fontsize=12)
ax1.set_ylabel('Phonon Lifetime (ps)', fontsize=12)
ax1.set_title('Phonon Lifetime vs Temperature', fontsize=13)
ax1.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
ax1.set_yscale('log')
ax2.plot(temperatures, linewidths, 'r-', linewidth=2)
ax2.set_xlabel('Temperature (K)', fontsize=12)
ax2.set_ylabel('Linewidth FWHM (meV)', fontsize=12)
ax2.set_title('Spectroscopic Linewidth vs Temperature', fontsize=13)
ax2.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('phonon_scattering_vs_temperature.png', dpi=150, bbox_inches='tight')
plt.show()
print(f"At 300 K:")
print(f" Phonon lifetime: {model.phonon_lifetime(q_test, 300)*1e12:.2f} ps")
print(f" Linewidth: {model.linewidth_fwhm(q_test, 300)/(1.602e-19*1e3):.2f} meV")
9.2 Expected Output
The code produces plots showing:
- Phonon Lifetime vs Temperature: Lifetime decreases with increasing temperature, approximately as \(\tau \propto 1/T^2\) at high \(T\).
- Linewidth vs Temperature: Linewidth increases with temperature, showing the anharmonic broadening effect observable in spectroscopy.
Typical values at 300 K for silicon:
- Phonon lifetime: ~1-10 ps
- Linewidth: ~0.1-1 meV
9.3 Extensions and Realistic Calculations
Beyond This Simplified Model
For quantitative predictions, one needs:
- First-principles force constants: Calculate \(\Phi^{(3)}\) from DFT
- Full Brillouin zone integration: Sum over all allowed scattering channels
- Realistic phonon dispersion: Use full band structure, not Debye approximation
- Conservation law enforcement: Explicitly check energy and momentum conservation
- Proper matrix element calculation: Include polarization vector dot products
Modern codes: ShengBTE, phono3py, Quantum ESPRESSO
9.4 Exercise: Modify the Code
Exercise 9.1: Temperature Scaling
Modify the code to plot the scattering rate \(\Gamma(T)\) on a log-log scale and verify the \(\Gamma \propto T^2\) scaling at high temperatures. At what temperature does this power law become valid?
Exercise 9.2: Wavevector Dependence
Calculate and plot the phonon lifetime as a function of wavevector \(q\) at fixed temperature \(T = 300\) K. How does the lifetime vary across the Brillouin zone?
10. Summary
Key Takeaways
- Anharmonicity is essential: The harmonic approximation fails to explain phonon lifetimes, thermal expansion, and thermal resistance.
- Force constant expansion: The lattice potential is expanded in powers of atomic displacements. Third-order terms lead to three-phonon processes, fourth-order to four-phonon processes.
- Fermi's golden rule: Provides the framework for calculating transition rates between phonon states.
- Three-phonon processes: Include decay (1 → 2 phonons) and coalescence (2 → 1 phonon), governed by energy and crystal momentum conservation.
- N vs U processes: Normal processes conserve momentum exactly (\(\mathbf{G} = 0\)); umklapp processes involve a reciprocal lattice vector (\(\mathbf{G} \neq 0\)) and cause thermal resistance.
- Temperature dependence: Scattering rates scale as \(\Gamma \propto T^2\) at high \(T\), while U-processes are exponentially suppressed at low \(T\).
- Phonon lifetime: \(\tau = 1/\Gamma\) determines spectroscopic linewidths and thermal conductivity.
- Experimental signatures: Anharmonicity appears as temperature-dependent linewidths, frequency shifts, and thermal expansion.
- Thermal conductivity: U-processes are the primary source of thermal resistance in pure crystals, leading to \(\kappa \propto 1/T\) at high temperatures.
- Computational methods: Modern first-principles codes can calculate phonon lifetimes and thermal conductivity from anharmonic force constants.
11. Exercises
Exercise 1: Conservation Laws (Basic)
A phonon with wavevector \(\mathbf{q}_1 = 0.4 \mathbf{G}_1\) and frequency \(\omega_1 = 10\) THz decays into two phonons. If one daughter phonon has \(\mathbf{q}_2 = 0.3 \mathbf{G}_1\) and \(\omega_2 = 6\) THz:
- What are \(\mathbf{q}_3\) and \(\omega_3\) for the other daughter phonon?
- Is this an N-process or U-process? (Assume \(\mathbf{G}_1\) is a primitive reciprocal lattice vector)
- Could this process occur at \(T = 0\) K? Why or why not?
Exercise 2: Temperature Dependence (Intermediate)
For a decay process with rate \(\Gamma^{\text{decay}} \propto (n_2 + 1)(n_3 + 1)\):
- Derive the high-temperature limit (\(k_B T \gg \hbar\omega\)) showing \(\Gamma \propto T^2\)
- What is the low-temperature behavior (\(k_B T \ll \hbar\omega\))? Include the exponential factor.
- At what temperature does the transition between these regimes occur?
Exercise 3: Umklapp Process Threshold (Intermediate)
In a simple cubic lattice with lattice constant \(a\), consider acoustic phonons with linear dispersion \(\omega = v q\).
- What is the minimum phonon energy required for a U-process to occur? (Hint: consider the geometry of the Brillouin zone)
- Express this in terms of the Debye temperature \(\Theta_D = \hbar v \pi/(a k_B)\)
- For silicon with \(\Theta_D = 645\) K, estimate the temperature below which U-processes are exponentially suppressed
Exercise 4: Linewidth Measurement (Advanced)
A Raman spectroscopy measurement of a phonon mode in silicon yields the following linewidths:
- At 100 K: FWHM = 0.3 cm⁻¹
- At 300 K: FWHM = 3.0 cm⁻¹
- At 500 K: FWHM = 8.0 cm⁻¹
- Convert these linewidths to phonon lifetimes (in ps). (Use \(\hbar = 5.3 \times 10^{-12}\) eV·s and \(1 \text{ cm}^{-1} = 1.24 \times 10^{-4}\) eV)
- Plot \(\Gamma\) vs \(T\) and determine if it follows the expected \(T^2\) scaling
- What other mechanisms might contribute to the linewidth at low temperatures?
Exercise 5: Four-Phonon vs Three-Phonon (Advanced)
The ratio of four-phonon to three-phonon scattering rates scales approximately as:
- Estimate \(u/a\) at room temperature for silicon (assume \(u \sim \sqrt{k_B T / M \omega^2}\))
- Under what conditions would four-phonon scattering contribute 25% or more to the total rate?
- Why might four-phonon scattering be more important for optical phonons than acoustic phonons?
Exercise 6: Thermal Conductivity Scaling (Challenging)
Using the simplified thermal conductivity formula \(\kappa \sim C v^2 \tau\):
- Show that when U-processes dominate with \(\tau \propto 1/T^2\), and the heat capacity is in the classical limit \(C \propto T\), the thermal conductivity scales as \(\kappa \propto 1/T\)
- Explain why real materials often show \(\kappa \propto 1/T^\alpha\) with \(\alpha < 1\) at intermediate temperatures
- At very low temperatures where boundary scattering dominates (\(\tau = L/v\)), what is the temperature dependence of \(\kappa\)?
Programming Exercise 7: Phase Space Analysis
Write a Python function to calculate the density of allowed three-phonon scattering channels for a given phonon \((\mathbf{q}_1, s_1)\):
- For a 1D chain with Debye dispersion, enumerate all \((q_2, q_3)\) pairs satisfying energy and momentum conservation for decay processes
- Distinguish between N and U processes
- Plot the phase space density as a function of \(q_1\) across the Brillouin zone
- How does the N vs U ratio change with \(q_1\)?
Further Reading
-
Classic Textbooks:
- Ashcroft & Mermin, Solid State Physics, Chapter 25: Anharmonic Effects in Crystals
- Dove, Introduction to Lattice Dynamics, Chapter 9: Anharmonic Interactions
- Ziman, Electrons and Phonons, Chapter 5: Anharmonic Effects
-
Modern Reviews:
- Lindsay et al., "Perspective on ab initio phonon thermal transport," J. Appl. Phys. 126, 050902 (2019)
- Togo & Tanaka, "First principles phonon calculations in materials science," Scr. Mater. 108, 1 (2015)
-
Advanced Topics:
- Feng & Ruan, "Quantum mechanical prediction of four-phonon scattering," Phys. Rev. B 93, 045202 (2016)
- Maradudin & Fein, "Scattering of neutrons by an anharmonic crystal," Phys. Rev. 128, 2589 (1962) - Classic paper on anharmonic scattering theory
-
Computational Tools:
- phono3py documentation - Open-source phonon-phonon scattering calculator
- ShengBTE - Lattice thermal conductivity from first principles