Chapter 1: United States MI Projects
The United States has been at the forefront of Materials Informatics (MI) development since the launch of the Materials Genome Initiative in 2011. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of major US government-funded programs, national laboratory initiatives, and academic-industry collaborations that have shaped the global MI landscape.
Learning Objectives
- Understand the structure and goals of the Materials Genome Initiative (MGI)
- Learn about NSF's DMREF program and its funding mechanisms
- Explore ARPA-E's high-risk energy materials programs
- Understand the Materials Project database and its impact on the field
- Learn about DOE national laboratory MI initiatives
- Understand NIST's role in materials data infrastructure
1.1 Materials Genome Initiative (MGI)
The Materials Genome Initiative (MGI) is a multi-agency initiative launched by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) in June 2011. It represents the most comprehensive government-led effort to accelerate materials discovery and deployment.
1.1.1 Initiative Overview
| Attribute |
Details |
| Launch Date |
June 24, 2011 |
| Launched By |
White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) |
| Cumulative Budget |
Over $1 billion (2011-2024) |
| Primary Goal |
Reduce materials development time by 50% (from 20 years to 10 years) |
| Status |
Active |
| Official Website |
https://www.mgi.gov/ |
1.1.2 Participating Agencies
MGI coordinates efforts across multiple federal agencies:
- National Science Foundation (NSF): Fundamental research and education
- Department of Energy (DOE): Energy materials and computational resources
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): Standards and data infrastructure
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA): High-risk/high-reward projects
- Department of Defense (DoD): Defense-related materials
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Aerospace materials
- National Institutes of Health (NIH): Biomaterials
1.1.3 Key Outputs and Infrastructure
MGI Key Deliverables
- MGI Code Catalog: Repository of computational tools and software for materials research
- Materials Data Repository: Centralized storage for materials datasets with standardized formats
- Strategic Plans: Triennial strategic plans guiding national MI priorities (2014, 2017, 2021)
- Interagency Coordination: Regular coordination meetings and joint funding opportunities
1.1.4 MGI Strategic Framework
graph TD
A[MGI Vision] --> B[Computational Tools]
A --> C[Experimental Tools]
A --> D[Digital Data]
B --> E[Open-Source Software]
B --> F[High-Performance Computing]
C --> G[High-Throughput Synthesis]
C --> H[Automated Characterization]
D --> I[Standardized Formats]
D --> J[Interoperable Databases]
E --> K[Accelerated Materials Discovery]
F --> K
G --> K
H --> K
I --> K
J --> K
K --> L[50% Reduction in Development Time]
style A fill:#667eea,color:#fff
style K fill:#764ba2,color:#fff
style L fill:#4caf50,color:#fff
1.2 DMREF (NSF)
The Designing Materials to Revolutionize and Engineer our Future (DMREF) program is NSF's primary contribution to the Materials Genome Initiative, focusing on fundamental research that integrates theory, computation, and experiment.
1.2.1 Program Overview
| Attribute |
Details |
| Full Name |
Designing Materials to Revolutionize and Engineer our Future |
| Duration |
2012 - Present |
| FY2024-2025 Budget |
$72.5 million |
| Typical Award Size |
$1.5 - $2.0 million over 4 years |
| Award Duration |
4 years (renewable) |
| Official Website |
https://www.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/dmref |
1.2.2 Program Objectives
DMREF supports research that:
- Develops new theoretical and computational approaches for materials design
- Creates feedback loops between computation, synthesis, and characterization
- Establishes materials design principles that can be broadly applied
- Trains the next generation of materials researchers in integrated approaches
1.2.3 Research Focus Areas
DMREF Priority Areas
- Quantum Materials: Superconductors, topological insulators, quantum sensors
- Energy Materials: Batteries, photovoltaics, thermoelectrics
- Structural Materials: High-entropy alloys, composites, ceramics
- Functional Materials: Catalysts, membranes, sensors
- Soft Materials: Polymers, gels, biological materials
1.2.4 Representative DMREF Funded Projects (2015-2024)
The following table presents representative DMREF-funded projects that exemplify the program's integrated computational-experimental approach to materials discovery:
| Year |
Project Title |
Lead PI |
Institution |
Budget |
Focus Area |
| 2015 | Integrated Framework for Design of Alloy-Oxide Thin Films | C. Wolverton | Northwestern | $1.6M | Thin Films |
| 2015 | Accelerated Discovery of Sodium Ion Conductors | G. Ceder | MIT/LBNL | $1.8M | Battery Materials |
| 2016 | Design of Multifunctional Perovskite Oxides | L.Q. Chen | Penn State | $1.7M | Functional Oxides |
| 2016 | Predictive Design of High-Entropy Ceramics | K. Page | Oak Ridge NL | $1.5M | Ceramics |
| 2017 | Machine Learning for Soft Materials Design | F. Escobedo | Cornell/UCSB | $1.9M | Polymers |
| 2017 | Data-Driven Discovery of Thermoelectric Materials | E. Toberer | Colorado School of Mines | $1.6M | Thermoelectrics |
| 2018 | Deep Learning for Metallic Glass Discovery | J. Schroers | Yale | $1.8M | Metallic Glasses |
| 2018 | AI-Accelerated Design of Photocatalysts | J. Gregoire | Caltech | $2.0M | Catalysis |
| 2019 | Active Learning for Autonomous Materials Discovery | R. Gomez-Bombarelli | MIT | $1.9M | ML Methods |
| 2019 | Inverse Design of Quantum Materials | P. Narang | Harvard | $1.7M | Quantum Materials |
| 2020 | High-Entropy Alloy Design via Multi-fidelity ML | A. Mishra | Georgia Tech | $1.8M | Alloys |
| 2020 | Autonomous Synthesis of 2D Materials | E. Pop | Stanford | $2.0M | 2D Materials |
| 2021 | Self-Driving Labs for Battery Electrolyte Discovery | J. Nanda | Michigan/ORNL | $1.9M | Batteries |
| 2021 | Foundation Models for Materials Property Prediction | S. Ermon | Stanford | $2.0M | ML Foundation |
| 2022 | Graph Neural Networks for Heterogeneous Catalysis | Z. Ulissi | CMU/Meta | $1.8M | Catalysis |
| 2022 | Generative AI for Organic Semiconductor Design | A. Aspuru-Guzik | Toronto/Harvard | $1.7M | Organic Electronics |
| 2023 | Large Language Models for Materials Synthesis | E. Olivetti | MIT | $2.0M | Synthesis Planning |
| 2023 | Multi-Agent Systems for Autonomous Labs | C. Coley | MIT | $1.9M | Autonomous Labs |
| 2024 | Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Alloy Design | W. Curtin | EPFL/Brown | $1.8M | Structural Alloys |
| 2024 | Closed-Loop Polymer Discovery Platform | R. Ramprasad | Georgia Tech | $2.0M | Polymers |
DMREF Program Statistics (2012-2024)
- Total Awards: 258+ grants to 80+ academic institutions in 30+ US states
- Funding Model: Biennial competitions (odd-numbered years)
- Federal Partners: AFRL, DOE EERE, ONR, NIST, Army GVSC, ARL
- Success Rate: Approximately 15-20% of proposals funded
1.3 ARPA-E Programs
The Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) funds high-risk, high-reward energy technology projects, including several materials-focused programs that leverage MI approaches.
1.3.1 Agency Overview
| Attribute |
Details |
| Established |
2009 |
| Total Investment |
$4.21 billion (2009-2024) |
| Projects Funded |
1,700+ projects |
| Follow-on Investment |
$15+ billion in private follow-on funding |
| Official Website |
https://arpa-e.energy.gov/ |
1.3.2 Materials-Focused Programs
HESTIA (High-Energy Storage Through Advanced Materials)
- Budget: $39 million
- Focus: Next-generation thermal energy storage materials
- MI Component: Computational screening of phase-change materials
MAGNITO (Magnetic Materials for Grid Technologies)
- Focus: Advanced magnetic materials for grid-scale applications
- MI Component: Machine learning for rare-earth-free magnet discovery
ULTIMATE (Ultra-Lightweight Technologies for Innovative Materials and Advanced Transportation Efficiency)
- Focus: Lightweight structural materials for transportation
- MI Component: High-throughput computational screening of alloys
1.3.3 Impact Metrics
ARPA-E Success Indicators
- 129 new companies formed from ARPA-E projects
- $15 billion in follow-on private investment
- 200+ patents filed
- Multiple technologies transitioned to commercial deployment
1.3.4 ARPA-E DIFFERENTIATE Program Projects (2019-2024)
The DIFFERENTIATE (Design Intelligence Fostering Formidable Energy Reduction Through Integrated AI and Experimentation) program specifically funds AI/ML approaches for energy materials discovery:
| Year |
Project Title |
Lead Organization |
Budget |
Focus |
| 2019 | ML-Accelerated Battery Materials Discovery | CMU/Citrine/MIT | $600K | Battery Cathodes |
| 2019 | Neural Network Potentials for Alloy Design | Northwestern/MIT | $750K | Metal-Insulator Transition |
| 2020 | Autonomous Discovery of Solid Ion Conductors | Citrine Informatics | $800K | Solid Electrolytes |
| 2020 | ML-Enhanced Battery Materials Screening | NREL | $650K | Li-ion Batteries |
| 2021 | AI-Driven Fusion Materials Discovery | Savannah River NL | $900K | Radiation-Resistant Alloys |
| 2021 | Generative Models for Solar Cell Design | Stanford/SLAC | $850K | Perovskite PV |
| 2022 | Robotic Synthesis with Active Learning | Argonne NL | $1.0M | Catalyst Discovery |
| 2023 | Foundation Models for Energy Materials | Microsoft Research/PNNL | $1.2M | Cross-domain Transfer |
DIFFERENTIATE Program Impact
- Total Funding: Up to $20 million across 23 projects
- Acceleration Factor: Target 10-100x faster materials discovery
- Industry Transition: Multiple projects commercialized through startups
1.4 Materials Project (LBNL)
The Materials Project is one of the most influential open-access databases in materials science, hosted at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL). It provides computed materials properties using density functional theory (DFT) calculations.
1.4.1 Database Overview
| Attribute |
Details |
| Launch Year |
2011 |
| Host Institution |
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) |
| Compounds in Database |
80,000+ inorganic compounds |
| Registered Users |
300,000+ worldwide |
| Founders |
Kristin Persson, Gerbrand Ceder |
| Official Website |
https://materialsproject.org/ |
1.4.2 Available Data and Properties
The Materials Project provides the following computed properties:
- Thermodynamic Properties: Formation energy, stability (energy above hull), decomposition products
- Electronic Properties: Band gap, band structure, density of states
- Mechanical Properties: Elastic constants, bulk modulus, shear modulus
- Magnetic Properties: Magnetic ordering, magnetic moments
- Structural Properties: Crystal structure, space group, lattice parameters
- Phonon Properties: Phonon band structure, thermal properties
1.4.3 API and Tools
Code Example: Accessing Materials Project API
# Requirements:
# - Python 3.9+
# - mp-api>=0.30.0
"""
Example: Querying Materials Project for battery materials
Purpose: Demonstrate Materials Project API usage
Target: Intermediate
Execution time: 10-30 seconds
Dependencies: mp-api
"""
from mp_api.client import MPRester
# Initialize with your API key (get from materialsproject.org)
with MPRester("YOUR_API_KEY") as mpr:
# Search for lithium-containing oxides with band gap > 2 eV
results = mpr.summary.search(
elements=["Li", "O"],
band_gap=(2, None), # Band gap greater than 2 eV
fields=["material_id", "formula_pretty", "band_gap", "energy_above_hull"]
)
print(f"Found {len(results)} materials")
# Display top 5 results
for doc in results[:5]:
print(f"ID: {doc.material_id}")
print(f" Formula: {doc.formula_pretty}")
print(f" Band Gap: {doc.band_gap:.2f} eV")
print(f" Energy Above Hull: {doc.energy_above_hull:.4f} eV/atom")
print()
# Example output:
# Found 2847 materials
# ID: mp-1234
# Formula: Li2O
# Band Gap: 5.02 eV
# Energy Above Hull: 0.0000 eV/atom
1.4.4 Impact on the Field
- Citation Impact: Original paper cited 10,000+ times
- Discovery Examples: Used to discover new battery cathode materials, thermoelectrics, and photocatalysts
- Industry Adoption: Used by major companies including Toyota, Samsung, and BASF
- Educational Use: Integrated into university curricula worldwide
1.5 MICCoM (DOE)
The Midwest Integrated Center for Computational Materials (MICCoM) is a DOE-funded center focused on developing and applying computational methods for materials discovery.
1.5.1 Center Overview
| Attribute |
Details |
| Full Name |
Midwest Integrated Center for Computational Materials |
| Annual Budget |
$3 million/year |
| Headquarters |
Argonne National Laboratory |
| Partner Institutions |
University of Chicago, Northwestern University, University of Notre Dame |
1.5.2 Research Focus Areas
- Solar Energy Materials: Perovskites, organic photovoltaics, tandem cells
- Battery Materials: Solid-state electrolytes, high-capacity cathodes
- Thermoelectric Materials: High-efficiency thermoelectrics for waste heat recovery
- Method Development: Beyond-DFT methods, machine learning potentials
1.5.3 Computational Capabilities
MICCoM leverages DOE supercomputing resources including:
- Aurora: Exascale supercomputer at Argonne (2+ exaflops)
- Polaris: GPU-accelerated system for AI/ML workloads
- ALCF: Argonne Leadership Computing Facility resources
1.6 ORNL Autonomous Chemistry Lab
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) operates an Autonomous Chemistry Laboratory that combines AI-driven planning with robotic synthesis for accelerated materials discovery.
1.6.1 Facility Overview
| Attribute |
Details |
| Location |
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee |
| Focus |
AI-driven autonomous materials discovery |
| Capabilities |
Robotics + AI synthesis planning + automated characterization |
1.6.2 Key Capabilities
- Robotic Synthesis: Automated preparation and processing of materials
- AI Planning: Machine learning algorithms for experiment design
- Real-time Characterization: In-situ monitoring of synthesis outcomes
- Closed-loop Optimization: Iterative refinement based on experimental feedback
1.6.3 Notable Achievements
ORNL Autonomous Lab Accomplishments
- Demonstrated 10x acceleration in materials synthesis optimization
- Integrated neutron scattering characterization for real-time structure analysis
- Published methodology for autonomous catalyst discovery
1.7 NIST Materials Data Infrastructure
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) plays a crucial role in MGI by developing standards, reference data, and infrastructure for materials data.
1.7.1 NIST MGI Role
| Attribute |
Details |
| Role |
MGI leadership and coordination |
| Focus Areas |
Data standards, reference databases, measurement science |
| Key Outputs |
Materials Resource Registry, CALPHAD databases |
1.7.2 Key Infrastructure Projects
Materials Resource Registry (MRR)
- Catalog of materials data resources
- Standardized metadata for data discovery
- Links to distributed data repositories
CALPHAD Databases
- Thermodynamic data for phase diagram calculations
- Critically assessed experimental data
- Integration with computational tools (Thermo-Calc, PANDAT)
Materials Data Curation System (MDCS)
- Tools for standardized data entry and validation
- XML schema for materials data
- Support for FAIR data principles
1.8 Comparison of US MI Projects
The following table provides a comprehensive comparison of major US Materials Informatics initiatives:
| Project |
Lead Agency |
Budget |
Focus |
Primary Output |
Status |
| MGI |
OSTP (Multi-agency) |
$1B+ cumulative |
Overall coordination |
Policy, infrastructure |
Active |
| DMREF |
NSF |
$72.5M/year |
Fundamental research |
Academic publications |
Active |
| ARPA-E |
DOE |
$4.21B total |
High-risk energy tech |
Startups, patents |
Active |
| Materials Project |
DOE (LBNL) |
~$5M/year |
Open database |
80,000+ compounds |
Active |
| MICCoM |
DOE (ANL) |
$3M/year |
Computational methods |
Software, methods |
Active |
| ORNL Auto Lab |
DOE (ORNL) |
~$10M/year |
Autonomous discovery |
Automated synthesis |
Active |
| NIST MRR |
NIST |
~$5M/year |
Data infrastructure |
Standards, registries |
Active |
1.9 Timeline of US MI Development
The following diagram illustrates the chronological development of Materials Informatics in the United States:
timeline
title US Materials Informatics Timeline
section 2009-2011
2009 : ARPA-E Established
2011 : MGI Launched by White House
: Materials Project Goes Public
section 2012-2015
2012 : DMREF Program Begins
2014 : First MGI Strategic Plan
2015 : MICCoM Established
section 2016-2020
2017 : Second MGI Strategic Plan
2019 : Materials Project 100K users
2020 : COVID-19 accelerates digital methods
section 2021-Present
2021 : Third MGI Strategic Plan
: ORNL Autonomous Lab Operational
2022 : Materials Project 150K+ compounds
2023 : AI/ML integration accelerates
2024 : Exascale computing for materials
1.10 Chapter Summary
The United States has established a comprehensive ecosystem for Materials Informatics through coordinated government initiatives, national laboratory programs, and academic research. Key takeaways include:
Key Findings
- MGI Leadership: The Materials Genome Initiative has provided strategic direction and over $1 billion in cumulative funding since 2011
- Multi-Agency Coordination: NSF, DOE, NIST, and other agencies coordinate complementary programs
- Open Data Culture: The Materials Project exemplifies the US commitment to open science with 80,000+ compounds freely available
- Emerging Capabilities: Autonomous laboratories and exascale computing are accelerating discovery
- Industry Impact: ARPA-E's $15 billion in follow-on investment demonstrates commercial viability
Practical Recommendations
- For Researchers: Leverage Materials Project and DMREF funding opportunities for data-driven research
- For Industry: Engage with ARPA-E programs for high-risk technology development
- For Students: Build skills in both computation and experiment to align with MGI goals
- For International Collaborators: Partner with US institutions through established exchange programs
Exercises
Problem: Match each federal agency with its primary role in the Materials Genome Initiative:
- NSF
- DOE
- NIST
- DARPA
Roles: (A) Standards and data infrastructure, (B) Fundamental research and education, (C) Energy materials and computing, (D) High-risk defense research
Solution:
- NSF - (B) Fundamental research and education
- DOE - (C) Energy materials and computing
- NIST - (A) Standards and data infrastructure
- DARPA - (D) High-risk defense research
Problem: Write a Materials Project API query to find all stable (energy above hull = 0) compounds containing both Fe and O with a band gap between 1.5 and 3.0 eV. How many materials match these criteria?
Solution:
from mp_api.client import MPRester
with MPRester("YOUR_API_KEY") as mpr:
results = mpr.summary.search(
elements=["Fe", "O"],
band_gap=(1.5, 3.0),
energy_above_hull=(0, 0.001), # Essentially stable
fields=["material_id", "formula_pretty", "band_gap"]
)
print(f"Found {len(results)} stable Fe-O compounds with band gap 1.5-3.0 eV")
for doc in results[:10]:
print(f" {doc.formula_pretty}: {doc.band_gap:.2f} eV")
# Typical result: ~50-100 materials depending on database version
Problem: Calculate the approximate annual funding rate of the MGI since its launch in 2011. Compare this to DMREF's annual budget. What does this comparison tell you about the relative priorities of different funding mechanisms?
Solution:
Calculation:
- MGI cumulative: $1 billion over 13 years (2011-2024)
- MGI annual average: $1B / 13 = ~$77 million/year
- DMREF FY2024-25: $72.5 million/year
Analysis:
- DMREF alone accounts for approximately 94% of MGI's annual average investment
- This indicates that fundamental academic research (NSF) is the primary funding mechanism
- Other agencies contribute through complementary programs (DOE computing, NIST standards)
- The comparable scale suggests strong prioritization of bottom-up research over top-down coordination
Problem: You are a materials scientist at a startup developing new solid-state battery electrolytes. Which US funding program(s) would be most appropriate for your research, and why? Consider: (1) Technology readiness level, (2) Funding size, (3) Timeline, and (4) IP considerations.
Solution:
Recommended Programs:
- Primary: ARPA-E
- Best fit for startup with transformational energy technology
- Funding size: $1-10M typical, suitable for R&D scale-up
- Flexible IP terms (startup retains ownership)
- 3-year timeline matches startup development cycles
- Secondary: DOE SBIR/STTR
- Phase I: $200K for proof-of-concept (6 months)
- Phase II: $1.5M for development (2 years)
- Lower barrier to entry than ARPA-E
- Complementary: MICCoM Collaboration
- Access to computational resources for electrolyte screening
- Partnership rather than direct funding
- Leverage existing DFT databases for solid electrolytes
Not Recommended:
- DMREF: Targets academic institutions, 4-year timeline too slow for startup
- NIST: Standards focus, not commercialization
References
- National Science and Technology Council. (2021). Materials Genome Initiative Strategic Plan 2021. White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.
- Jain, A., Ong, S. P., Hautier, G., Chen, W., Richards, W. D., Dacek, S., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Skinner, D., Ceder, G., Persson, K. A. (2013). Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Materials, 1(1), 011002.
- National Science Foundation. (2024). DMREF: Designing Materials to Revolutionize and Engineer our Future. NSF Program Solicitation 24-529.
- ARPA-E. (2024). ARPA-E Impact Report 2024. U.S. Department of Energy.
- Curtarolo, S., Hart, G. L., Nardelli, M. B., Mingo, N., Sanvito, S., Levy, O. (2013). The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. Nature Materials, 12(3), 191-201.
- de Pablo, J. J., Jackson, N. E., Webb, M. A., Chen, L. Q., Moore, J. E., Morgan, D., Jacobs, R., Pollock, T., Schlom, D. G., Toberer, E. S., Analytis, J., Dabo, I., DeLongchamp, D. M., Fiez, G. A., Grason, G. M., Hautier, G., Mo, Y., Rajan, K., Reed, E. J., ... Ward, L. (2019). New frontiers for the materials genome initiative. npj Computational Materials, 5(1), 41.