Chapter 4: Cloud Labs and Remote Experiments
Study Time: 20-25 min
Introduction
Purchasing and maintaining experimental equipment requires costs ranging from millions to hundreds of millions of yen, along with specialized expertise. However, by using a Cloud Laboratory, you can perform experiments using the world's most advanced equipment with zero initial investment.
In this chapter, focusing on Emerald Cloud Lab (ECL), we will learn about how cloud labs work, requesting experiments via API, automated data retrieval, and cost-efficiency analysis. You will experience a new research style in which experiments are described in program code and executed remotely.
Learning Objectives
By studying this chapter, you will acquire the following:
- Concept of cloud labs: How the platform works and its business model
- How to use Emerald Cloud Lab: Account creation, experiment requests, data retrieval
- API programming: Experiment automation via REST API and Python SDK
- Protocol description: Encoding experimental procedures as code
- Cost-efficiency evaluation: Quantitative comparison of traditional laboratory vs. cloud lab
- Advantages of remote experiments: Equipment sharing, expert technician support, scalability
4.1 What Is a Cloud Lab
4.1.1 Basic Concept of Cloud Labs
A cloud lab is a platform that turns experimental equipment and robotics into a cloud service.
Main features: - Zero initial investment: No equipment purchase required, pay-as-you-go - Expert technicians: Equipment maintenance and quality control handled by the provider - Equipment sharing: One instrument shared among multiple researchers - Scalability: Scale up experiment volume as needed - Remote access: Experiments possible from anywhere in the world
4.1.2 Major Cloud Lab Platforms
| Platform | Features | Target Fields | Price Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emerald Cloud Lab | 200+ instruments, Python SDK | Life sciences, chemistry, materials | Pay-as-you-go |
| Strateos | Life-science focused, high degree of automation | Drug discovery, bio | High price range |
| Synthace (Antha) | Bioprocess design platform | Synthetic biology | Subscription |
| Transcriptic | Integrated into Strateos | Bio | - |
In this chapter, we focus on Emerald Cloud Lab (ECL).
4.2 Overview of Emerald Cloud Lab
4.2.1 Available Instruments
Main instruments available in ECL:
Liquid handling: - Hamilton STAR: High-precision automated dispensing - Beckman Biomek: Microplate processing - OpenTrons OT-2: General-purpose liquid handling
Analytical instruments: - HPLC (High-Performance Liquid Chromatography) - GC-MS (Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry) - LC-MS (Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry) - FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy) - UV-Vis spectrophotometer - Fluorescence spectrometer - NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy)
Others: - Flow cytometer - Plate reader - Centrifuge - Thermal cycler (PCR) - Incubator
# Example listing of instruments available in Emerald Cloud Lab
import pandas as pd
ecl_instruments = [
{'Category': 'Liquid Handling', 'Instrument': 'Hamilton STAR', 'Use': 'Automated dispensing, serial dilution'},
{'Category': 'Liquid Handling', 'Instrument': 'OpenTrons OT-2', 'Use': 'General-purpose pipetting'},
{'Category': 'Chromatography', 'Instrument': 'Agilent HPLC', 'Use': 'Compound separation and quantification'},
{'Category': 'Mass Spectrometry', 'Instrument': 'Thermo GC-MS', 'Use': 'Volatile compound analysis'},
{'Category': 'Mass Spectrometry', 'Instrument': 'Agilent LC-MS', 'Use': 'Biomolecule analysis'},
{'Category': 'Spectroscopy', 'Instrument': 'Agilent UV-Vis', 'Use': 'Absorption spectrum measurement'},
{'Category': 'Spectroscopy', 'Instrument': 'Molecular Devices', 'Use': 'Fluorescence/luminescence measurement'},
{'Category': 'NMR', 'Instrument': 'Bruker 400MHz', 'Use': 'Structural analysis'},
]
df_instruments = pd.DataFrame(ecl_instruments)
print("Example of instruments available in Emerald Cloud Lab:")
print(df_instruments.to_string(index=False))
# Aggregation by instrument category
print(f"\nNumber of instruments per category:")
print(df_instruments['Category'].value_counts())
4.2.2 Account Creation and Access
Step 1: Account registration
1. Visit https://www.emeraldcloudlab.com/
2. Fill out the application form from "Request Access"
3. Provide your affiliation and research purpose
4. Approval (typically 1-2 business days)
Step 2: Obtaining an API key
# Installing the ECL Python SDK (actual procedure)
# pip install emerald-cloud-lab
# Setting the API key (environment variables)
import os
# In practice, the actual API key is managed via environment variables or a config file
ECL_API_KEY = os.environ.get('ECL_API_KEY', 'your_api_key_here')
ECL_PROJECT_ID = os.environ.get('ECL_PROJECT_ID', 'your_project_id')
print("ECL connection settings:")
print(f" API key: {'*' * 20}{ECL_API_KEY[-5:]}")
print(f" Project ID: {ECL_PROJECT_ID}")
4.3 Requesting Experiments via API
4.3.1 Basic Experiment Protocol
In ECL, experiment protocols are described in Python code.
# Emerald Cloud Lab Python SDK (pseudocode, in a form close to the actual API)
class ECLExperiment:
"""
Simulator for ECL experiment protocols
Mimics the interface of the actual ECL SDK
"""
def __init__(self, experiment_name, project_id):
self.experiment_name = experiment_name
self.project_id = project_id
self.protocol = []
def add_reagent(self, name, volume, concentration):
"""Add a reagent"""
self.protocol.append({
'action': 'add_reagent',
'name': name,
'volume': volume,
'concentration': concentration
})
print(f"Added reagent: {name} {volume} µL ({concentration} M)")
def mix(self, duration, speed):
"""Mix"""
self.protocol.append({
'action': 'mix',
'duration': duration,
'speed': speed
})
print(f"Mix: {duration} sec, {speed} rpm")
def incubate(self, temperature, duration):
"""Incubation"""
self.protocol.append({
'action': 'incubate',
'temperature': temperature,
'duration': duration
})
print(f"Incubation: {temperature}°C, {duration} min")
def measure_absorbance(self, wavelength):
"""Absorbance measurement"""
self.protocol.append({
'action': 'measure_absorbance',
'wavelength': wavelength
})
print(f"Absorbance measurement: {wavelength} nm")
def submit(self):
"""Submit the experiment"""
print(f"\nSubmitting experiment protocol: {self.experiment_name}")
print(f" Project ID: {self.project_id}")
print(f" Number of steps: {len(self.protocol)}")
print(" Status: submission complete, awaiting execution...")
# In the actual ECL, an API request would be sent
return {'experiment_id': 'exp_12345', 'status': 'queued'}
# Usage example: a simple enzyme reaction assay
experiment = ECLExperiment(
experiment_name='Enzyme Activity Assay',
project_id='project_001'
)
# Describing the protocol
print("=== Creating experiment protocol ===\n")
# Add substrate
experiment.add_reagent('Substrate A', volume=100, concentration=0.1)
# Add enzyme
experiment.add_reagent('Enzyme', volume=10, concentration=0.01)
# Mix
experiment.mix(duration=10, speed=300)
# Incubate at room temperature
experiment.incubate(temperature=25, duration=30)
# Absorbance measurement
experiment.measure_absorbance(wavelength=450)
# Submit the experiment
result = experiment.submit()
print(f"\nExperiment ID: {result['experiment_id']}")
print(f"Status: {result['status']}")
4.3.2 Advanced Protocol: 96-Well Plate Screening
def create_96well_screening_protocol(compound_list, concentrations):
"""
Compound screening protocol on a 96-well plate
Args:
compound_list: List of compounds
concentrations: List of concentrations for each compound
Returns:
Protocol dictionary
"""
protocol = {
'experiment_name': '96-well compound screening',
'plate_type': 'corning_96_wellplate_360ul_flat',
'steps': []
}
# Step 1: Dispense substrate into all wells
protocol['steps'].append({
'action': 'dispense',
'reagent': 'substrate_buffer',
'destination': 'all_wells',
'volume': 100 # µL
})
# Step 2: Dispense compounds into each well
for i, (compound, conc) in enumerate(zip(compound_list, concentrations)):
row = i // 12 # A-H (0-7)
col = i % 12 + 1 # 1-12
well = f"{chr(65 + row)}{col}" # A1, A2, ..., H12
protocol['steps'].append({
'action': 'dispense',
'reagent': compound,
'destination': well,
'volume': 10, # µL
'concentration': conc
})
# Step 3: Incubation
protocol['steps'].append({
'action': 'incubate',
'temperature': 37, # °C
'duration': 60 # min
})
# Step 4: Measure with plate reader
protocol['steps'].append({
'action': 'plate_reader',
'measurement_type': 'absorbance',
'wavelength': 450, # nm
'read_all_wells': True
})
return protocol
# Protocol creation example
compounds = [f'Compound_{i:02d}' for i in range(1, 97)] # 96 compounds
concentrations = [10**(-i/12) for i in range(96)] # concentration gradient (10^0 → 10^-8 M)
protocol_96well = create_96well_screening_protocol(compounds, concentrations)
print("96-well screening protocol:")
print(f" Experiment name: {protocol_96well['experiment_name']}")
print(f" Plate type: {protocol_96well['plate_type']}")
print(f" Number of steps: {len(protocol_96well['steps'])}")
print(f"\nKey steps:")
for i, step in enumerate(protocol_96well['steps'][:5], 1): # Display the first 5 steps
print(f" {i}. {step['action']}: {step.get('reagent', step.get('measurement_type', ''))}")
4.4 Automated Data Retrieval and Cloud Storage
4.4.1 Downloading Experiment Results
import requests
import json
import time
class ECLDataManager:
"""
Simulator for ECL data management
"""
def __init__(self, api_key, base_url='https://api.emeraldcloudlab.com'):
self.api_key = api_key
self.base_url = base_url
self.headers = {
'Authorization': f'Bearer {api_key}',
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
}
def check_experiment_status(self, experiment_id):
"""
Check the status of an experiment
Args:
experiment_id: Experiment ID
Returns:
Status information
"""
# Actual API call (simulation)
# response = requests.get(f'{self.base_url}/experiments/{experiment_id}', headers=self.headers)
# Simulation
statuses = ['queued', 'running', 'running', 'completed']
status = np.random.choice(statuses)
return {
'experiment_id': experiment_id,
'status': status,
'progress': 75 if status == 'running' else (100 if status == 'completed' else 0),
'estimated_completion': '2025-10-20 14:30:00' if status != 'completed' else '2025-10-20 13:45:00'
}
def download_results(self, experiment_id, output_file):
"""
Download experiment results
Args:
experiment_id: Experiment ID
output_file: Destination file name
Returns:
Downloaded data
"""
print(f"Downloading experiment results: {experiment_id}")
# Actual API call (simulation)
# response = requests.get(f'{self.base_url}/experiments/{experiment_id}/results', headers=self.headers)
# data = response.json()
# Simulation data
data = {
'experiment_id': experiment_id,
'measurements': [
{'well': f'{chr(65+i//12)}{i%12+1}', 'absorbance': np.random.uniform(0.1, 2.0)}
for i in range(96)
],
'metadata': {
'plate_type': 'corning_96_wellplate_360ul_flat',
'wavelength': 450,
'temperature': 25
}
}
# Save to a local file
with open(output_file, 'w') as f:
json.dump(data, f, indent=2)
print(f" Save complete: {output_file}")
return data
def wait_for_completion(self, experiment_id, check_interval=60):
"""
Wait for the experiment to complete
Args:
experiment_id: Experiment ID
check_interval: Check interval (seconds)
Returns:
Final status
"""
print(f"Waiting for experiment completion: {experiment_id}")
print(f" Check interval: {check_interval} sec\n")
while True:
status_info = self.check_experiment_status(experiment_id)
status = status_info['status']
progress = status_info['progress']
print(f" Status: {status}, Progress: {progress}%")
if status == 'completed':
print(" Experiment complete!")
break
elif status == 'failed':
print(" Experiment failed")
break
time.sleep(check_interval)
return status_info
# Usage example
data_manager = ECLDataManager(api_key='demo_key')
# Check experiment status
experiment_id = 'exp_12345'
status = data_manager.check_experiment_status(experiment_id)
print(f"Experiment status: {status['status']}, Progress: {status['progress']}%")
# Wait for experiment completion (simulation)
# final_status = data_manager.wait_for_completion(experiment_id, check_interval=5)
# Download results
print("\nDownloading results:")
results = data_manager.download_results(experiment_id, 'ecl_results.json')
# Data analysis
df_results = pd.DataFrame(results['measurements'])
print(f"\nMeasurement data: {len(df_results)} wells")
print(df_results.head(10))
# Visualization
absorbance_values = np.array([m['absorbance'] for m in results['measurements']]).reshape(8, 12)
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 6))
plt.imshow(absorbance_values, cmap='YlOrRd', interpolation='nearest')
plt.colorbar(label='Absorbance')
plt.xlabel('Column', fontsize=12)
plt.ylabel('Row', fontsize=12)
plt.title('96-Well Plate Measurement Results', fontsize=14, fontweight='bold')
plt.xticks(range(12), [f'{i+1}' for i in range(12)])
plt.yticks(range(8), ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F', 'G', 'H'])
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('ecl_96well_results.png', dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')
plt.show()
4.5 Cost Comparison: Traditional Laboratory vs. Cloud Lab
4.5.1 Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis
def calculate_tco(scenario, years=5):
"""
Calculate the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Args:
scenario: 'traditional' (traditional laboratory) or 'cloud' (cloud lab)
years: Evaluation period (years)
Returns:
Cost breakdown
"""
if scenario == 'traditional':
# Traditional laboratory
costs = {
'initial_investment': {
'HPLC': 5_000_000, # yen
'GC-MS': 8_000_000,
'UV-Vis spectrophotometer': 1_000_000,
'Liquid handling robot': 10_000_000,
'Other equipment': 5_000_000,
'total': 29_000_000
},
'annual_operating_cost': {
'Maintenance': 2_000_000, # yen/year
'Consumables': 1_500_000,
'Reagents': 3_000_000,
'Personnel (technician)': 5_000_000,
'Utilities': 500_000,
'total': 12_000_000
}
}
total_cost = costs['initial_investment']['total'] + costs['annual_operating_cost']['total'] * years
else: # scenario == 'cloud'
# Cloud lab
costs = {
'initial_investment': {
'Equipment purchase': 0,
'Account registration': 0,
'total': 0
},
'annual_operating_cost': {
'Experiment cost (pay-as-you-go)': 8_000_000, # yen/year (depends on number of experiments)
'Reagents (partial)': 1_000_000,
'Data storage': 200_000,
'total': 9_200_000
}
}
total_cost = costs['initial_investment']['total'] + costs['annual_operating_cost']['total'] * years
costs['total_cost_{years}yr'] = total_cost
costs['average_annual_cost'] = total_cost / years
return costs
# TCO comparison
years = 5
tco_traditional = calculate_tco('traditional', years)
tco_cloud = calculate_tco('cloud', years)
print("=" * 60)
print(f"Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) comparison (over {years} years)")
print("=" * 60)
print("\n[Traditional Laboratory]")
print(f" Initial investment: ¥{tco_traditional['initial_investment']['total']:,}")
print(f" Annual operating cost: ¥{tco_traditional['annual_operating_cost']['total']:,}")
print(f" Total cost ({years} years): ¥{tco_traditional['total_cost_{years}yr']:,}")
print(f" Average annual cost: ¥{tco_traditional['average_annual_cost']:,}")
print("\n[Cloud Lab]")
print(f" Initial investment: ¥{tco_cloud['initial_investment']['total']:,}")
print(f" Annual operating cost: ¥{tco_cloud['annual_operating_cost']['total']:,}")
print(f" Total cost ({years} years): ¥{tco_cloud['total_cost_{years}yr']:,}")
print(f" Average annual cost: ¥{tco_cloud['average_annual_cost']:,}")
cost_savings = tco_traditional['total_cost_{years}yr'] - tco_cloud['total_cost_{years}yr']
savings_percent = (cost_savings / tco_traditional['total_cost_{years}yr']) * 100
print(f"\nCost savings: ¥{cost_savings:,} ({savings_percent:.1f}%)")
# Visualization
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(14, 6))
# (1) Total cost comparison
scenarios = ['Traditional Lab', 'Cloud Lab']
total_costs = [tco_traditional['total_cost_{years}yr'], tco_cloud['total_cost_{years}yr']]
colors = ['coral', 'limegreen']
bars = ax1.bar(scenarios, [c/1_000_000 for c in total_costs], color=colors, alpha=0.8, edgecolor='black', linewidth=1.5)
ax1.set_ylabel('Total Cost (million yen)', fontsize=12)
ax1.set_title(f'Total Cost Comparison over {years} Years', fontsize=14, fontweight='bold')
for i, bar in enumerate(bars):
height = bar.get_height()
ax1.text(bar.get_x() + bar.get_width()/2., height,
f'¥{total_costs[i]/1_000_000:.1f}M\n({savings_percent:.1f}% reduction)' if i == 1 else f'¥{total_costs[i]/1_000_000:.1f}M',
ha='center', va='bottom', fontsize=11, fontweight='bold')
ax1.grid(axis='y', alpha=0.3)
# (2) Annual cumulative cost
years_range = np.arange(1, years + 1)
cumulative_traditional = tco_traditional['initial_investment']['total'] + tco_traditional['annual_operating_cost']['total'] * years_range
cumulative_cloud = tco_cloud['initial_investment']['total'] + tco_cloud['annual_operating_cost']['total'] * years_range
ax2.plot(years_range, cumulative_traditional / 1_000_000, marker='o', linewidth=2, markersize=8, label='Traditional Lab', color='coral')
ax2.plot(years_range, cumulative_cloud / 1_000_000, marker='s', linewidth=2, markersize=8, label='Cloud Lab', color='limegreen')
ax2.set_xlabel('Elapsed Years', fontsize=12)
ax2.set_ylabel('Cumulative Cost (million yen)', fontsize=12)
ax2.set_title('Cumulative Cost Trend', fontsize=14, fontweight='bold')
ax2.legend()
ax2.grid(alpha=0.3)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('cost_comparison_traditional_vs_cloud.png', dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')
plt.show()
Interpretation of results: - Initial investment: Traditional lab is 29 million yen, cloud lab is 0 yen - Total cost over 5 years: Traditional lab is 89 million yen, cloud lab is 46 million yen - Cost savings: About 48% (43 million yen)
4.5.2 Scalability and Cost Efficiency
def cost_per_experiment(scenario, num_experiments):
"""
Cost per experiment as a function of the number of experiments
Args:
scenario: 'traditional' or 'cloud'
num_experiments: Number of experiments per year
Returns:
Cost per experiment (yen)
"""
if scenario == 'traditional':
# Fixed costs (equipment depreciation + maintenance)
fixed_cost = (29_000_000 / 5) + 2_000_000 # yen/year
# Variable costs (reagents, consumables)
variable_cost_per_exp = 15_000 # yen/experiment
total_cost = fixed_cost + variable_cost_per_exp * num_experiments
cost_per_exp = total_cost / num_experiments
else: # cloud
# Pay-as-you-go
cost_per_exp = 30_000 # yen/experiment (average)
return cost_per_exp
# Compare cost efficiency by varying the number of experiments
experiment_counts = np.array([10, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000])
cost_traditional = [cost_per_experiment('traditional', n) for n in experiment_counts]
cost_cloud = [cost_per_experiment('cloud', n) for n in experiment_counts]
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
plt.plot(experiment_counts, [c/1000 for c in cost_traditional], 'o-', linewidth=2, markersize=10, label='Traditional Lab', color='coral')
plt.axhline(y=cost_cloud[0]/1000, color='limegreen', linestyle='--', linewidth=2, label='Cloud Lab (constant)')
plt.xlabel('Number of Experiments per Year', fontsize=12)
plt.ylabel('Cost per Experiment (thousand yen)', fontsize=12)
plt.title('Number of Experiments and Cost Efficiency', fontsize=14, fontweight='bold')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(alpha=0.3)
plt.xscale('log')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('cost_efficiency_scalability.png', dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')
plt.show()
# Break-even point
breakeven = None
for n in range(10, 1001):
if cost_per_experiment('traditional', n) <= cost_per_experiment('cloud', n):
breakeven = n
break
if breakeven:
print(f"Break-even point: the traditional lab becomes advantageous at {breakeven} or more experiments per year")
else:
print("Within the evaluated range, the cloud lab is always advantageous")
Conclusion: - Small number of experiments (<200/year): The cloud lab is overwhelmingly advantageous - Large number of experiments (>500/year): The traditional lab is also an option (but with the burden of initial investment and maintenance) - Startups and small-scale labs: The cloud lab is optimal
4.6 Advantages of Remote Experiments
4.6.1 Equipment Sharing and Access
# Simulation of equipment access in a cloud lab
import datetime
class InstrumentScheduler:
"""
Instrument scheduler for a cloud lab
"""
def __init__(self):
self.instruments = {
'HPLC_1': {'status': 'available', 'queue': []},
'GC-MS_1': {'status': 'busy', 'queue': []},
'UV-Vis_1': {'status': 'available', 'queue': []},
}
def book_instrument(self, instrument_name, user, duration_hours):
"""
Book an instrument
Args:
instrument_name: Instrument name
user: User name
duration_hours: Usage time (hours)
Returns:
Booking information
"""
if instrument_name not in self.instruments:
return {'success': False, 'message': 'Instrument not found'}
instrument = self.instruments[instrument_name]
if instrument['status'] == 'available':
instrument['status'] = 'busy'
start_time = datetime.datetime.now()
end_time = start_time + datetime.timedelta(hours=duration_hours)
booking = {
'user': user,
'start_time': start_time.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M'),
'end_time': end_time.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M'),
'duration': duration_hours
}
instrument['queue'].append(booking)
print(f"Booking successful: {instrument_name}")
print(f" User: {user}")
print(f" Start: {booking['start_time']}")
print(f" End: {booking['end_time']}")
return {'success': True, 'booking': booking}
else:
# Add to queue
print(f"{instrument_name} is in use. Adding to the queue.")
return {'success': False, 'message': 'Added to the queue'}
# Usage example
scheduler = InstrumentScheduler()
# Book instruments
booking1 = scheduler.book_instrument('HPLC_1', user='researcher_A', duration_hours=2)
booking2 = scheduler.book_instrument('UV-Vis_1', user='researcher_B', duration_hours=1)
print("\nAdvantages:")
print(" - Improved instrument utilization (available 24 hours)")
print(" - Sharing among multiple researchers")
print(" - Efficient use through a booking system")
4.6.2 Expert Technician Support
Specialist staff at cloud labs: - Instrument operators: Experiment execution, troubleshooting - Data scientists: Analysis support - Quality control personnel: Instrument calibration, precision management
Advantages: - Researchers can focus on research (freed from equipment maintenance) - No specialized knowledge required (just describe the protocol) - High-quality data (quality controlled by experts)
4.7 Exercises
Exercise 1: Creating a Protocol (Difficulty: Easy)
Describe the following experiment in ECL protocol format.
Experiment: IC50 measurement of an enzyme inhibitor 1. Dispense 50 µL of substrate into 96 wells 2. Add inhibitor with serial dilution (10^-4 → 10^-10 M) 3. Add 10 µL of enzyme 4. Incubate at 37°C for 30 minutes 5. Measure absorbance (450 nm)
Sample Solution
experiment = ECLExperiment('IC50 Measurement', 'project_enzyme')
# Dispense substrate
for well in range(96):
row = well // 12
col = well % 12 + 1
well_id = f"{chr(65 + row)}{col}"
experiment.add_reagent('Substrate', volume=50, concentration=0.1)
# Inhibitor serial dilution (column A)
concentrations = [10**(-4 - i) for i in range(8)] # 10^-4 → 10^-11 M
for i, conc in enumerate(concentrations):
well_id = f"A{i+1}"
experiment.add_reagent(f'Inhibitor_{conc}M', volume=10, concentration=conc)
# Add enzyme
for well in range(96):
experiment.add_reagent('Enzyme', volume=10, concentration=0.001)
# Incubation
experiment.incubate(temperature=37, duration=30)
# Measurement
experiment.measure_absorbance(wavelength=450)
experiment.submit()
Exercise 2: Cost Optimization (Difficulty: Medium)
Your lab performs 150 experiments per year. Compare whether a cloud lab (30,000 yen/experiment) or a traditional lab (initial investment 29 million yen, annual maintenance 12 million yen, variable cost 15,000 yen/experiment) is more economical, using the 5-year TCO.
Sample Solution
years = 5
experiments_per_year = 150
# Traditional lab
initial_investment_traditional = 29_000_000
annual_fixed_cost_traditional = 12_000_000
variable_cost_per_exp_traditional = 15_000
total_traditional = initial_investment_traditional + (annual_fixed_cost_traditional + variable_cost_per_exp_traditional * experiments_per_year) * years
# Cloud lab
cost_per_exp_cloud = 30_000
total_cloud = cost_per_exp_cloud * experiments_per_year * years
print(f"5-year TCO comparison ({experiments_per_year} experiments/year):")
print(f" Traditional lab: ¥{total_traditional:,}")
print(f" Cloud lab: ¥{total_cloud:,}")
print(f" Difference: ¥{abs(total_traditional - total_cloud):,}")
if total_cloud < total_traditional:
savings = (1 - total_cloud / total_traditional) * 100
print(f" Conclusion: the cloud lab is {savings:.1f}% more advantageous")
else:
print(f" Conclusion: the traditional lab is more advantageous")
**Example output**:
5-year TCO comparison (150 experiments/year):
Traditional lab: ¥102,250,000
Cloud lab: ¥22,500,000
Difference: ¥79,750,000
Conclusion: the cloud lab is 78.0% more advantageous
Chapter Summary
In this chapter, we learned about cloud labs and remote experiments.
Key Points
-
Concept of cloud labs: - Turning equipment and robotics into a cloud service - Zero initial investment, pay-as-you-go
-
Emerald Cloud Lab: - 200+ instruments - Programmable experiments via Python SDK
-
API programming: - Describing experiment protocols as code - Requesting experiments via REST API - Automated data retrieval
-
Cost efficiency: - About 48% cost reduction over 5 years - The cloud lab is overwhelmingly advantageous for a small number of experiments - Optimal for startups and small-scale labs
-
Advantages of remote experiments: - Access from anywhere in the world - Expert technician support - High utilization through equipment sharing
Preview of the Next Chapter
In Chapter 5, we will learn about real-world applications and careers. Through concrete cases such as catalyst screening, quantum dot synthesis, and battery materials exploration, along with the Berkeley A-Lab case study, we will explore career paths in the field of robotic experimentation.
References
- Emerald Cloud Lab. "ECL Documentation." https://www.emeraldcloudlab.com/documentation/
- Linshiz, G. et al. (2014). "PaR-PaR laboratory automation platform." ACS Synthetic Biology, 3(2), 97-106.
- King, R. D. et al. (2009). "The Automation of Science." Science, 324(5923), 85-89.
- Roch, L. M. et al. (2020). "ChemOS: An orchestration software to democratize autonomous discovery." PLoS ONE, 15(4), e0229862.
To the next chapter: Chapter 5: Real-World Applications and Careers